We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Can the UK afford the NHS (in its current form)?
Comments
-
I've just realised how ridiculous the original question is.
We're a first world economy who only participate in wars of our choosing. We're supposed to be one of the biggest economies on the planet. And we've got one of the cheapest healthcare systems in the first world.
If we can't afford our NHS, who on earth can afford anything?
No country is rich enough to provide all the healthcare that all of its citizens would like to consume for free. The argument isn't how taxpayers can pay for healthcare that is given away it's what is the best way to ration healthcare.
At present the UK model is to ration by queuing: if you need a new hip then you will wait several months for it and probably find that you face some pretty substantial opposition to being put onto a waiting list for it. This is quite an interesting prezzo on deaths on waiting lists in Wales.
http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sitesplus/documents/986/Stephen%20Dorman%20-%20Cardiac%20Surgery%20Waiting%20list%20mortality%20-%20amended%20040414.pdf
It is interesting to note that for all the 'envy of the world' guff, not one single country has opted to use the NHS as a model for healthcare provision, every country that I can think of that has a proper public health system uses some form of co-payment system to introduce some financial rationing into it, especially into the non-urgent parts.0 -
No country is rich enough to provide all the healthcare that all of its citizens would like to consume for free. The argument isn't how taxpayers can pay for healthcare that is given away it's what is the best way to ration healthcare.
At present the UK model is to ration by queuing: if you need a new hip then you will wait several months for it and probably find that you face some pretty substantial opposition to being put onto a waiting list for it. This is quite an interesting prezzo on deaths on waiting lists in Wales.
http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sitesplus/documents/986/Stephen%20Dorman%20-%20Cardiac%20Surgery%20Waiting%20list%20mortality%20-%20amended%20040414.pdf
It is interesting to note that for all the 'envy of the world' guff, not one single country has opted to use the NHS as a model for healthcare provision, every country that I can think of that has a proper public health system uses some form of co-payment system to introduce some financial rationing into it, especially into the non-urgent parts.
I don't believe that "envy of the world" guff as I think the rest of the world thinks our system is dirt cheap but supplies only a pathetic amount of healthcare. I do wonder if nobody's thought that the funding could be expanded to typical first-world levels.There is no honour to be had in not knowing a thing that can be known - Danny Baker0 -
lawriejones1 wrote: »Journalists don't collect or process national statistics, so I can't answer your question directly (My guess is that nobody actually could accurately). But feel free to use your rights - probably soon to be taken away - to request an FOI from the DH.
Scratching the surface, the DH itself estimates that: "The gross cost of 'deliberate' health tourism for urgent treatment in England to anywhere between £110 million and £280 million."
That's a fraction of 1% of the entire NHS budget.
The others who claim treatment are legitimately entitled to live here. There does seem a problem claiming this money back actually, but they (and their families) do contribute to the UK economy, so I can't complain too much.
Here's one reasonable estimate of the costs'Deliberate' use of the NHS—use by those who come here specifically to receive free treatment or who come for other reasons but take advantage of the system when they're here—is hard to quantify. It's thought to be very roughly between £110 million and £280 million a year.
'Normal' use of the NHS—by foreign visitors who've ended up being treated while in England—is estimated to cost about £1.8 billion a year.
The majority of these costs aren't currently charged for. Only about £500 million is thought to be recoverable or chargeable at the moment.
https://fullfact.org/health/health-tourists-how-much-do-they-cost-and-who-pays/“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and who weren't so lazy.”0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards