We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Am I missing something?

Options
135

Comments

  • greenglide
    greenglide Posts: 3,301 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker Hung up my suit!
    Will I then be required to complete a tax return?
    And if you are, is that a problem?

    I always expect higher rate tax payers to do self assessment as a matter or routine. Is is hardly rocket science. The on line system for self assessment has been available for over 15 years now and it works well.

    You do know that higher rate tax payers are entitled to additional tax relief on their gift aid contributions? Also, of course, there is the small matter of declaring interest received, even if already taxed, to pay the extra due.
  • MrRee_2
    MrRee_2 Posts: 2,389 Forumite
    Thats no bother then
    Bringing Happiness where there is Gloom!
  • MrRee_2
    MrRee_2 Posts: 2,389 Forumite
    Thank you newbie ..... most kind ;)
    Bringing Happiness where there is Gloom!
  • uk1
    uk1 Posts: 1,862 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    zagfles wrote: »
    Why do you think you'd get better protection from the PPF drawing it early? AIUI the protection gets better at NPD of the scheme, not the date you draw it.


    My understanding is that so long as the fund isn't taken into PPF before the OP's normal retirement age and as long as the early pension taken is below the absolute limit (it is) then the protection is better in that it will not be scaled back. As far as I know if he waited and it went into the fund before he took it it is scaled back.

    Also if he is taking pension whilst in the fund there are increases, but many DB schemes are discretionary which now often means zero.

    Have I misunderstood the PPF? It wouldn't surprise me.

    Jeff
  • atush
    atush Posts: 18,731 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    MrRee wrote: »
    Will I then be required to complete a tax return?


    For the pension alone? No, a phone call as i said before would be enough.

    But if you have other issues as a HRTaxpayer and you have not given enough detail we cannot say. but a phone call , again to hmrc would tell you the answer.
  • MrRee_2
    MrRee_2 Posts: 2,389 Forumite
    Cheers ...
    Bringing Happiness where there is Gloom!
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,443 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    edited 15 May 2016 at 10:32PM
    uk1 wrote: »
    My understanding is that so long as the fund isn't taken into PPF before the OP's normal retirement age and as long as the early pension taken is below the absolute limit (it is) then the protection is better in that it will not be scaled back. As far as I know if he waited and it went into the fund before he took it it is scaled back.
    Eh? Your first scenario says "as long as the fund isn't taken into PPF before the OP's normal retirement age". Well if that applies then if he takes it at normal retirement age it's not going to have gone into the PPF before he takes it then, is it??

    If the fund goes into the PPF before NPD then it's scaled back, if the fund goes into PPF after NPD it isn't. Whether he's taken it or not is irrelevant.
    Also if he is taking pension whilst in the fund there are increases, but many DB schemes are discretionary which now often means zero.
    Increases on deferred pensions usually have to be increased with statutory requirements, which I think is inflation capped at 5% pre 2009 service and 2.5% post 2009 service. This is better than indexation in payment which is 0% for pre-97 service at 2.5% capped for the rest. Might be different if he still works for the company and they use an ongoing final salary link, then it'll depend on his payrises.
  • uk1
    uk1 Posts: 1,862 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    zagfles wrote: »
    Eh? Your first scenario says "as long as the fund isn't taken into PPF before the OP's normal retirement age". Well if that applies then if he takes it at normal retirement age it's not going to have gone into the PPF before he takes it then, is it??

    If the fund goes into the PPF before NPD then it's scaled back, if the fund goes into PPF after NPD it isn't. Whether he's taken it or not is irrelevant. Increases on deferred pensions usually have to be increased with statutory requirements, which I think is inflation capped at 5% pre 2009 service and 2.5% post 2009 service. This is better than indexation in payment which is 0% for pre-97 service at 2.5% capped for the rest. Might be different if he still works for the company and they use an ongoing final salary link, then it'll depend on his payrises.

    http://www.pensionprotectionfund.org.uk/Pages/Compensation.aspx

    No, it isn't scaled back.



    If You Have Retired

    You will have been receiving a pension from your scheme before your former employer went bust.

    If you were beyond the scheme’s normal retirement age when your employer went bust, the Pension Protection Fund will generally pay 100 per cent level of compensation, which means we will generally pay you the same amount in compensation when your scheme enters the PPF.


    Jeff
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,443 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    uk1 wrote: »
    If you beyond the normal retirement date!! If you weren't then it is scaled back. So whether you take it early or not makes no difference!!
  • PensionTech
    PensionTech Posts: 711 Forumite
    Yes, zagfles is entirely right. Look at the various scenarios:

    1. Member takes pension before NRD, scheme goes into PPF before member's NRD. Result: member's pension is scaled back.
    2. Member takes pension before NRD, scheme goes into PPF after member's NRD. Result: member's pension is not scaled back.
    3. Member does not take pension until NRD, scheme goes into PPF before member's NRD. Result: member's pension is scaled back.
    4. Member does not take pension until NRD, scheme goes into PPF after member's NRD. Result: member's pension is not scaled back.

    So it is indeed irrelevant whether or not the member takes early retirement; if the scheme goes into the PPF before NRD, he will only get 90% of benefits, and if it goes into the PPF after NRD, he will get 100%, regardless of how long before NRD his benefits were in payment.
    I am a Technical Analyst at a third-party pension administration company. My job is to interpret rules and legislation and provide technical guidance, but I am not a lawyer or a qualified advisor of any kind and anything I say on these boards is my opinion only.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.