We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Am I missing something?

Options
MrRee_2
MrRee_2 Posts: 2,389 Forumite
This is so simple (to me) - but Pensions Expert doesn't understand my logic .... so, over to you to either show me the error of my thinking or to confirm that I understand what I'm doing!

I'm in a DB Pension Scheme.

This scheme is about to close to future accrual.

I am able to draw on the Pension now if I wish - with it being reduced by the GAD Factor. This basically means that I will lose around 10% off my pension and around 5% off my Lump Sum if I draw down now - 2 years early.

A pensions expert I am talking to cannot understand why I would want to while still working ..... I agree with him, IF the scheme was to remain open. BUT, if it closes to future accrual all I will be losing by drawing early is the GAD factor mentioned above.

Therefore, let's take some round numbers to illustrate my thinking.

Annual Pension of £22,000 has been built up in the scheme to date. A tax free lump sum of £66,000 is also payable at that time.

Taking my pension now, 2 years early, means that (using the above round numbers) I will receive £20,000 per year instead of £22,000 applying the GAD factor. The tax free lump sum will reduce to £62,700.

Now, this is my thinking ...... I will receive £20,000 x 2 = £40,000 extra money from the pension as I am drawing 2 years early.

This 'costs' me £2,000 per year for life.

If I have received £40,000 more from the fund by leaving 2 years early then the crossover point where I am worse off jumping out 2 years early is £40,000/£2,000 = 20 years.

Is this right or have I missed something - my logic can be flawed sometimes! As in 20 years time I doubt I will care if I am losing £2,000 a year from that point on - as I will be dribbling down my vest in a care home somewhere probably!

I am aware of the tax position - I will be paying 40% tax on every single penny of the early pension.

Again, using the above figures, I have an option to take £20,000 a year and tax free lump sum of £62,700. OR about £16,000 and a £105,000 tax free lump sum. This sum results in a crossover point 12 years hence so maybe taking the larger income is better than the larger tax free lump sum? But the tax position makes that less interesting while I continue working.

The biggest reason for drawing early is peace of mind in case the fund is put into the PPF ...... which I seriously worry about.

So, my question is simple ...... is the above correct? Mainly the 20 years it takes to make taking the pension early a mistake?
Bringing Happiness where there is Gloom!
«1345

Comments

  • sandsy
    sandsy Posts: 1,752 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    How old are you?
    Will you still be a 40% tax payer in two years time and thereafter?
    Is there any fixed rate revaluation GMP in deferment?
    What is the pension increase in payment pattern?
    What is the funding level of the scheme?
  • MrRee_2
    MrRee_2 Posts: 2,389 Forumite
    58 - retirement age 60 ..... although I can work on of course.

    40% taxpayer now without the early pension and will be as long as I work.

    20% taxpayer when pension in payment if not working.

    GMP ... there is a small amount - if I understand the question.

    Pension will increase by cpi while in the closed scheme, I think.

    Funding level ... I pay 10% Employer pays 26% - but that's irrelevant if it closes. Employer state they will have to continue to pay 13% into scheme to fund the deficit of £400 million on around £2 billion assets.

    Is my 20 years maths above correct? If I lose £2,000 per year for life, yet receive £40,000 more as I collect early ......... this means that it takes 20 years to make the early collection a mistake?
    Bringing Happiness where there is Gloom!
  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    MrRee wrote: »
    As in 20 years time I doubt I will care if I am losing £2,000 a year from that point on - as I will be dribbling down my vest in a care home somewhere probably!

    Without googling for it, just tell us what you think the life expectancy of the average 58 year old male is.
    Free the dunston one next time too.
  • MrRee_2
    MrRee_2 Posts: 2,389 Forumite
    80 ........................
    Bringing Happiness where there is Gloom!
  • MrRee_2
    MrRee_2 Posts: 2,389 Forumite
    BUT, that's different to ACTIVE life!!

    Generally an 80 year old has slowed down, has less desire to do things and needs less money.

    In addition, I will receive my state pension at 66 .... so, in 8 years time I get topped up by far more than the £2k lost on my DB Scheme.

    Is my 20 years maths correct?
    Bringing Happiness where there is Gloom!
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,609 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    GMP ... there is a small amount - if I understand the question.



    https://www.barnett-waddingham.co.uk/comment-insight/blog/2014/08/18/what-is-a-gmp/

    How would your GMP revalue in deferment if you chose not to take it?

    Have you obtained a new state pension statement?

    If you continue to work for this employer under the new DC scheme, will salary sacrifice be a possibility?

    Will you be able to sacrifice or contribute enough into the DC scheme ( or a SIPP perhaps) to bring you down to basic rate tax?

    Be a little careful here if you draw your DB early- http://adviser.royallondon.com/pensions/technical-central/information-guidance/contributions-and-tax-relief/recycling-of-tax-free-cash/

    Do you have the choice of not taking the PCLS or is it compulsory?
  • Happier_Me
    Happier_Me Posts: 563 Forumite
    I am no expert so this is a question really to those on the board that know far more than me!

    But would it possible for the OP to take the pension and then pay into a personal pension to reclaim the 40% tax back? I know there are certain rules around doing this which I am expect someone could clarify.
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,443 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    Look up index linked annuity rates for a 60 year old, with 5-year guarantee and spouse benefits, which DB schemes usually have. These are around 3% or so.

    Why do you think you'd get better protection from the PPF drawing it early? AIUI the protection gets better at NPD of the scheme, not the date you draw it.
  • Apodemus
    Apodemus Posts: 3,410 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I think you are underestimating the cross-over date since you don't factor in any return on the lump sum (which I am assuming you might invest). Also as mentioned above, you could use that lump sum to put back into another pension over the next couple of years and reduce your income tax for these years quite considerably, again extending the cross-over point.
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Therefore, let's take some round numbers to illustrate my thinking.

    Annual Pension of £22,000 has been built up in the scheme to date. A tax free lump sum of £66,000 is also payable at that time.


    Taking my pension now, 2 years early, means that (using the above round numbers) I will receive £20,000 per year instead of £22,000 applying the GAD factor. The tax free lump sum will reduce to £62,700.

    Now, this is my thinking ...... I will receive £20,000 x 2 = £40,000 extra money from the pension as I am drawing 2 years early.



    But you won't, will you ? Because you will I understand be paying 40% tax now but 20% if you wait. So You'll pay 40% tax on that. So you'll receive £24k extra money. For that you are giving up £1600 a year (£2k - 20%) which will take 15 years to pay back. So that's age 73 is the crossover. Not sure if that makes any difference to you but it is a closer run thing than you initially calculated

    So, i think the different taxation rates is what you missed.

    I guess the other thing you've missed is, what is your plan for that money? If you don't plan to spend it until you retire it's not really buying you anything to take it now.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.