We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Missing Lease and other troubles
Comments
-
Hmmm... yeah. I guess I have not considered what would happen if their seller were to pull out.
To give a bit more information, the flat we are attempting to buy was not the seller's residence, it was a rental property (which has not been tennated since its been on the market). I guess my assumption was that maybe if their seller doesnt pull out, then we might be in a strong(ish) position because if we pull out, they lose thier new purchase and are stuck with an empty flat to maintain and re-market.
In terms of the granting a new lease / getting an extension out of it, I was more thinking that the seller sorts this out with the freeholder before we complete. My thoughts were if they can do this informally then maybe it won't cause such a hold up... but in all honesty this is just my speculation.
So that leads me here... what do I want out of this AND what is reasonable to ask of the seller... bearing in mind we don't want to be difficult, we just want to protect our interests...
(Oh, and this assumes we can get a version of the lease the LR and our Lender will accept)
1. We want to purchase a flat with 86 years (min.) left on the lease and service charges not exceeding £600pa - for the price we offered £175,00.... Well we know this is now impossible because that deal is no longer on the table... so...
2. We want to purchase a flat with a new 99 year lease and will absorb the £1300pa service charges and accept exsiting lease terms... but out offer must remain at £175,00 and the seller must bear the costs of sorting this out. OR...
3. We accept that there are only 84 years remaining and will have to extend in 2 years time for costs of £5-10k(including fees). We accept the increase in service charges (£700pa more than expected). However we reduce our offer to account for the fact in 2 years time (and to have a chance of selling in under 5 years) we will be £6.4-11.4K down (potentially) .... we reduce our offer to £165.00 say... OR
4. We walk away. No flat and time and money down the drain
I guess my question is does anyone think its worth exploring 2 or 3... before we plump for number 4 and everyone ends up dissapointed?
Worth also saying, whilst the seller is in a chain we have no chain and are not in a hurry so can afford some time to sort...0 -
When you say "service charges", what do they include? Sinking fund?0
-
Service charge includes: Monthly maintance charge, a magagement fee (for the freeholder - theres no agent. He has set the charge to 20% of the manitance fee) and I did also lump the ground rent in there (so thats £20pa)... takes it to roughly £1300pa
There is a term stating the lessor may create a 'reasonable reserve fund' for future maintanance, decoration and repair of £50 per half year. As far as I am aware the freeholder has not done this to date.
We would also be responsible for 50% of charges to repair the buildings structure (i..e. walls, gutters, chimneys, roof etc) ... although I guess this is fairly typical in the leasehold scenario?0 -
If there is anything I have learned from this is get a good solicitor! Our's has been great ... but the seller's has been absolutely AWFUL.
We have been waiting for two days to get the 'new/correct' documents for them to send us the exact same stuff... rubbish...0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards