We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Why is travel insurance so inflexible on cost?
Options

ShoestringBudget
Posts: 1 Newbie
I am trying to arrange travel insurance for my parents aged 77 and 69 for a long visit to India (70days).
They have a few pre-existing medical conditions but through good personal care and medication they manage really well - so they are generally very healthy.
Last year they also went to India for around 35 days - there was no issue with travel insurance - the cost was around £250 - everything declared.
This year with a longer trip I expected the cost to be somewhat higher but typically all the insurance seems to be around double that.
For me having cover is the most important - particularly medical - but I'm amazed that there is no way to reduce premiums by offering a flexible voluntary excess.
I would happily double the excess if I could reduce premiums substantially as the probability of a claim is quite small.
Furthermore, there doesn't seem to be flexibility on the component parts either - you just have to accept X for baggage, Y for curtailment, Z for cancellation.
Does anyone know of a travel insurer that will do this (premium/excess trade-off)?
Thanks
They have a few pre-existing medical conditions but through good personal care and medication they manage really well - so they are generally very healthy.
Last year they also went to India for around 35 days - there was no issue with travel insurance - the cost was around £250 - everything declared.
This year with a longer trip I expected the cost to be somewhat higher but typically all the insurance seems to be around double that.
For me having cover is the most important - particularly medical - but I'm amazed that there is no way to reduce premiums by offering a flexible voluntary excess.
I would happily double the excess if I could reduce premiums substantially as the probability of a claim is quite small.
Furthermore, there doesn't seem to be flexibility on the component parts either - you just have to accept X for baggage, Y for curtailment, Z for cancellation.
Does anyone know of a travel insurer that will do this (premium/excess trade-off)?
Thanks
0
Comments
-
ShoestringBudget wrote: »I am trying to arrange travel insurance for my parents aged 77 and 69 for a long visit to India (70days).
They have a few pre-existing medical conditions but through good personal care and medication they manage really well - so they are generally very healthy.
Last year they also went to India for around 35 days - there was no issue with travel insurance - the cost was around £250 - everything declared.
This year with a longer trip I expected the cost to be somewhat higher but typically all the insurance seems to be around double that.
For me having cover is the most important - particularly medical - but I'm amazed that there is no way to reduce premiums by offering a flexible voluntary excess.
I would happily double the excess if I could reduce premiums substantially as the probability of a claim is quite small.
Furthermore, there doesn't seem to be flexibility on the component parts either - you just have to accept X for baggage, Y for curtailment, Z for cancellation.
Does anyone know of a travel insurer that will do this (premium/excess trade-off)?
Thanks
I think I'm lost? Why would you not expect a policy that's twice as long to cost twice as much?0 -
Furthermore, there doesn't seem to be flexibility on the component parts either - you just have to accept X for baggage, Y for curtailment, Z for cancellation.
Having bundled pricing is cheaper for the majority. Its cheaper in administration and re-assurance. However, you can still get a tailored policy if you want. Although it probably wont be cheaper.I would happily double the excess if I could reduce premiums substantially as the probability of a claim is quite small.
At their ages, the issue isnt really an insignificant excess. In your 20s or 30s it is baggage that is really the main cost. So, a hundred pound excess can make a difference. In your 60s and 70s, it is medical that ist he issue and a hundred pounds additional excess is nothing compared to medical costs.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards