We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Flat "owner" refuses to pay service charges
littlerock
Posts: 1,774 Forumite
My sister lives in a large 1930s block of private flats where the head lease is owned by a well known London property estate. The estate tried, and failed, some years ago, to stop renewing the leases as the flats changed hands. This means a number of the flat owners have long leases (like my sister who got hers extended when she bought it 10 years ago) and other long standing owners have shorter leases.
Recently a builder/developer has been approaching some of the older owners and purchased their flats at a premium. He now owns around 12 flats which he is doing up, not sure whether to sell or let.
Anyway the estate levies a management and service charge on all the owners and recently they were all required to contribute to repainting the exterior. The builder refused to pay and work has stopped on part of the frontage as a result.
Now it is going to court. My sister is suprised the builder would take on the estate which is wealthy and litigious. But he clearly has a solicitor in tow so must have a case.
Under what circumstances can a leasehold owner in a block of flats, refuse to pay their share of the maintenance? Is there some legal loophole the builder is exploiting? Does anyone know?
Recently a builder/developer has been approaching some of the older owners and purchased their flats at a premium. He now owns around 12 flats which he is doing up, not sure whether to sell or let.
Anyway the estate levies a management and service charge on all the owners and recently they were all required to contribute to repainting the exterior. The builder refused to pay and work has stopped on part of the frontage as a result.
Now it is going to court. My sister is suprised the builder would take on the estate which is wealthy and litigious. But he clearly has a solicitor in tow so must have a case.
Under what circumstances can a leasehold owner in a block of flats, refuse to pay their share of the maintenance? Is there some legal loophole the builder is exploiting? Does anyone know?
0
Comments
-
Probably best asked on the House Buying Renting and Selling board.0
-
If the works aren't small (and a complete re-decoration won't be), then there is a long and tedious process to be followed before work starts. It involves multiple steps of consultations and getting quotes for the work to be done.
If the freeholder hasn't followed the process correctly, then a leaseholder can refuse to pay.If it sticks, force it.
If it breaks, well it wasn't working right anyway.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards