We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Loft conversion pre-1985
larryhud
Posts: 4 Newbie
Hello,
I have been searching various forums and cannot find an answer to my particular question.
We have just bought a delightful detached 1930’s house with a loft conversion which creates 2 more rooms. There is no record of the work via building regs’ history online but I would guess it was done sometime in the 70/80s. We did take out an indemnity policy when we bought the house.
Structurally it is very sound and done to a very high standard, e.g. proper supports, beautiful staircase, large windows etc. The previous owners were using the rooms as habitable rooms (1 office and 1 bedroom) and we are doing the same.
However, it clearly does not meet the modern building regs’ requirements, specifically around the fire regs’. I am not concerned legally as it was done a long time ago and we have indemnity insurance. However my question is:
Can it be used as a habitable room legally if no building regs’ were required at the time of conversion? I cannot believe that all ‘old’ houses suddenly have to give up all their habitable space every time legal regs change?! Moreover, does anyone know what the insurance position would be in the event of a claim?
(I understand the fire risk(s) and we plan to de-risk this by some expensive/modern smoke detector systems – however as it has open plan staircases, it would be dreadful - looks wise - to have to implement fire doors and enclosed staircases)
(I am also not concerned the cost of resale as we bought it with the assumption it had 2 loft rooms and would sell it with the same assertion)
Thanks,
Larry
I have been searching various forums and cannot find an answer to my particular question.
We have just bought a delightful detached 1930’s house with a loft conversion which creates 2 more rooms. There is no record of the work via building regs’ history online but I would guess it was done sometime in the 70/80s. We did take out an indemnity policy when we bought the house.
Structurally it is very sound and done to a very high standard, e.g. proper supports, beautiful staircase, large windows etc. The previous owners were using the rooms as habitable rooms (1 office and 1 bedroom) and we are doing the same.
However, it clearly does not meet the modern building regs’ requirements, specifically around the fire regs’. I am not concerned legally as it was done a long time ago and we have indemnity insurance. However my question is:
Can it be used as a habitable room legally if no building regs’ were required at the time of conversion? I cannot believe that all ‘old’ houses suddenly have to give up all their habitable space every time legal regs change?! Moreover, does anyone know what the insurance position would be in the event of a claim?
(I understand the fire risk(s) and we plan to de-risk this by some expensive/modern smoke detector systems – however as it has open plan staircases, it would be dreadful - looks wise - to have to implement fire doors and enclosed staircases)
(I am also not concerned the cost of resale as we bought it with the assumption it had 2 loft rooms and would sell it with the same assertion)
Thanks,
Larry
0
Comments
-
-
Surely the horse has already bolted...!?0
-
Bolted? From the point of view of buying the house yes, but curious as this exact question has not been answered (until now). Also, it does not preclude the many future options (from do nothing all the way through to a full re-conversion..)0
-
Bolted? From the point of view of buying the house yes, but curious as this exact question has not been answered (until now). Also, it does not preclude the many future options (from do nothing all the way through to a full re-conversion..)
Well indeed.
I'm really not sure what your question/query is?0 -
"Can it be used as a habitable room legally if no building regs’ were required at the time of conversion? I cannot believe that all ‘old’ houses suddenly have to give up all their habitable space every time legal regs change?! Moreover, does anyone know what the insurance position would be in the event of a claim?"0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 350.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.2K Spending & Discounts
- 243.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.5K Life & Family
- 256.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards