We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
application of Stamp Duty Surcharge

loofer
Posts: 565 Forumite


Doesn't seem very clear on the .GOV site so hoping somebody can direct to somehwre that can clarify (my opinion differs from my solicitor).
Most will know that from 1st April there was a 3% surcharge introduced for holders of more than one residential property.
My situation:
I own a BTL property that I have let out. I bought it when I was young and own it outright. I've only ever lived with my parents or more recently renting a house myself.
I am now purchasing a house to live in for myself. I will not be selling the BTL property. So at the end of the day I will own 2 houses.
I am not adding to my BTL portfolio and I am actually replacing my main residence (which I am currently renting as a tenant).
The flow chart on the .GOV websites says you don't pay the surcharge if "you are replacing your main residence (which is being sold)".
It's the bit in brackets which get's me. I am replacing my main residence, but it's not mine to sell as I'm currently renting my main residence.
My solicitor reckons I have to pay the the surcharge as end of the day I will own more than one property. It's costing me an additional £5100 in SDLT. Something I could do without.
The way I see it, somebody who has a 10 house portfolio will pay the same SDLT as me if they bought the house as another BTL whereas I'm buying it for my main residence and giving up a house back on rental market.
Hope that makes sense and somebody can clarify an authoritative source.
Most will know that from 1st April there was a 3% surcharge introduced for holders of more than one residential property.
My situation:
I own a BTL property that I have let out. I bought it when I was young and own it outright. I've only ever lived with my parents or more recently renting a house myself.
I am now purchasing a house to live in for myself. I will not be selling the BTL property. So at the end of the day I will own 2 houses.
I am not adding to my BTL portfolio and I am actually replacing my main residence (which I am currently renting as a tenant).
The flow chart on the .GOV websites says you don't pay the surcharge if "you are replacing your main residence (which is being sold)".
It's the bit in brackets which get's me. I am replacing my main residence, but it's not mine to sell as I'm currently renting my main residence.
My solicitor reckons I have to pay the the surcharge as end of the day I will own more than one property. It's costing me an additional £5100 in SDLT. Something I could do without.
The way I see it, somebody who has a 10 house portfolio will pay the same SDLT as me if they bought the house as another BTL whereas I'm buying it for my main residence and giving up a house back on rental market.
Hope that makes sense and somebody can clarify an authoritative source.
0
Comments
-
Of course you have to pay the surcharge, you will own two properties. If you don't want to pay it, sell the BTL first.0
-
Your solicitor is right.
The key facts are that you will end up owning two properties, and are not selling a 'main residence' and buying another.Retired in 2015.
Moved to Ireland September 20170 -
-
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/509184/GuidanceNote_Final.pdf
Section 8 - Q and A
Q2 is exactly your scenario, and yes you have to pay.0 -
Bluebirdman_of_Alcathays wrote: »https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/509184/GuidanceNote_Final.pdf
Section 8 - Q and A
Q2 is exactly your scenario, and yes you have to pay.
Thanks, that clarifies and confirms it for me.0 -
I am replacing my main residence, it was the bit in brackets and the fact that it was in brackets that lead me to question it. All clear now
But you never were replacing your main residence, SDLT is all about ownership and you don't own the place where you currently live, so there was no question of replacement. It's a complete red herring.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards