We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Deposit not protected

Have recently moved out of a flat after living there for five years. The landlady said she was keeping the full £495 bond because of damage to the carpet and microwave, both of which I have issue with. I rang MyDeposits and they said the certificate with them ended in November 2015 (At this time the letting agent changed but I continued to live at the property). Isn't this illegal?

What should my next move be?
«1

Comments

  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    Yes.


    I would suggest a quick call to the LL to say: Return my deposit and we'll forget about you failing to protect it.


    Follow up with a more official letter if that doesn't work.
  • FBaby
    FBaby Posts: 18,374 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I thought I had read somewhere that deposits were protected as long as the tenant remained in the same property, even if the certificate expired (or was returned obviously)?
  • boliston
    boliston Posts: 3,012 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    I think that if a LL fails to protect a deposit then they have to return the deposit TWICE - the LL would be laughing if you just asked for it back ;)
  • FBaby
    FBaby Posts: 18,374 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    But if a certificate was issues, it was protected. What doesn't make sense to me is why, if indeed a deposit is automatically protected throughout the tenancy, the certificate would have an expiry date.

    I'm just wondering whether it means that the new agent protected it elsewhere, but I didn't think that would have been possible without OP's agreement?
  • bruirn
    bruirn Posts: 107 Forumite
    I have spoken to the new letting agent and they said the bond money remained with the old letting company (which I find strange). Sounds to me that like they've mucked up the administration and rather than transferring the certificate they've ended it, leaving the deposit unprotected for the past five months or so.

    I'm guessing incompetence is no defence.
  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    boliston wrote: »
    I think that if a LL fails to protect a deposit then they have to return the deposit TWICE - the LL would be laughing if you just asked for it back ;)

    Yes and the OP needs to find £1,000 for court action...
  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    bruirn wrote: »
    I have spoken to the new letting agent and they said the bond money remained with the old letting company (which I find strange). Sounds to me that like they've mucked up the administration and rather than transferring the certificate they've ended it, leaving the deposit unprotected for the past five months or so.

    I'm guessing incompetence is no defence.



    Sorry, I thought I was clear, speak to your LANDLORD, not the agent. The agent will just cover their own backside.
  • bruirn
    bruirn Posts: 107 Forumite
    Guest101 wrote: »
    Sorry, I thought I was clear, speak to your LANDLORD, not the agent. The agent will just cover their own backside.

    Sorry. I have no contact details for my landlord, have only ever dealt with the agents.
  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    bruirn wrote: »
    Sorry. I have no contact details for my landlord, have only ever dealt with the agents.

    Time to find those details then.


    Ask the letting agent to provide you them, they must do so with-in 28 days.
  • bruirn
    bruirn Posts: 107 Forumite
    Guest101 wrote: »
    Time to find those details then.


    Ask the letting agent to provide you them, they must do so with-in 28 days.

    Thank you. Will do that. It already seems like the two agents are blaming each other so I wasn't going to make any progress there..
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.