Clarification for failure to display

suzigun

Thanks, will do.

System

I don't really want to pay £60 but I'd prefer that to the £100 it will go up to.

Where is the logic that says if the £60 is not owed in the first place then £100 should be paid instead.

It's clearly nonsense that an increasing amount is more payable than a lesser one where there is no merit. But using the same nonsensical logic, then the officious bystander might conclude there is merit in the parking company's claim if you are even considering paying it.

suzigun

The signs referring to railway byelaws are Indigo's.


One parking sign states in its heading 'Railway byelaws: car park terms of use' and further down that 'the car park is subject to railway byelaws. The requirements set out below relate to matters required or prohibited under byelaw 14 or are lawful instructions for use of the car park issued under that byelaw.'


It goes on later to say 'A penalty notice may be issued for any breach of the instructions above and, in accordance with railway byelaw 14 (4) (i), the pliantly for such breach is...'