We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Tenants in Common but no Deed of Trust
Mathshead
Posts: 32 Forumite
Some guidance in principle please. I purchased a house with my girlfriend a few years ago, but now we have decided to split up. When we bought the house the tenancy was set up as Tenants in Common because we thought it a good idea to confirm that we were making different levels of contribution to the deposit, but although we were advised by the solicitor to confirm this with Deed of Trust document, we didn't get round to doing it. Now fast forward a few years and we have no legal record of the difference in shares. In this sort of case, will the presumption be 50:50 share, or can I argue that I paid a much bigger share of the deposit and have contributed more to the household costs to get a bigger share of the sale value. Any expert advice would be appreciated.
0
Comments
-
You will need to instruct a solicitor to advise you. How are things between you? Do you think it is likely that she will honour what you originally agreed, or will she want to go for half?0
-
Thanks. I am hoping we can talk about this objectively and avoid legal costs. I am pretty certain though that she will be starting the negotiation from the default half and half position to get advantage in other areas.0
-
If you think that she will not want to honour what you originally agreed then I would suggest you make an appointment with a solicitor on your own to see what your options are. Most will do a fixed fee for an initial appointment. If you have a decent amount of equity in the house and you believe you are entitled to more than half of it then some professional advice would be money well spent. But if you talk to your ex-girlfriend first then you will have more information to give the solicitor.0
-
Do you have any paper work from the purchase? If you can find the Transfer Deed you may have noted on there the shares you wished to hold the property in. But if the Deed got sent to the land registry it's most likely been destroyed.
If you bought less than six years ago you can ask your original solicitors to retrieve the purchase file too, they may have notes on what you agreed - nothing legal but might be helpful to youCurrently studying for a Diploma - wish me luck
Phase 1 - Emergency Fund - Complete :j
Phase 2 - £20,000 Mortgage Fund - Underway0 -
Do you have any paper work from the purchase? If you can find the Transfer Deed you may have noted on there the shares you wished to hold the property in. But if the Deed got sent to the land registry it's most likely been destroyed.
If you bought less than six years ago you can ask your original solicitors to retrieve the purchase file too, they may have notes on what you agreed - nothing legal but might be helpful to you
Agreed. In the absence of a separate trust deed the shares should have been recorded on the TR1 Section 10 which is effectively a simplified deed of trust. If the purchase was only "a few years" ago then the Solicitor should have retained a copy of the TR1.0 -
Thanks, Problem is that we both know what the relative shares are based on the original contribution to the deposit and subsequent contribution, but we didn't ever commit that to any sort of document. I don have anything in writing that confirms that it may have been an intention to have the ownership in unequal shares.0
-
Thanks, Problem is that we both know what the relative shares are based on the original contribution to the deposit and subsequent contribution, but we didn't ever commit that to any sort of document. I don have anything in writing that confirms that it may have been an intention to have the ownership in unequal shares.
So have you tried to obtain a copy of the TR1 or not?0 -
Have you spoke to the other person or are you asuming they want 50%?0
-
I haven't raised it directly. Before doing so I wanted to check the legal position. I may be surprised and we can reach agreement, but I need to be aware of what law says before having that discussion.0
-
No, and I am not sure its relevant here. I don't recall such a document as part of purchase process, and isn't it related to land transfer?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards