We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Wise to tell bank in advance?

2»

Comments

  • GingerBob wrote: »
    You forgot to mention pedophiles.

    pedophiles don't generally have that much money to move around, they spend it all on sweets and puppies.
  • GingerBob_3
    GingerBob_3 Posts: 3,659 Forumite
    pedophiles don't generally have that much money to move around, they spend it all on sweets and puppies.


    Doesn't matter. The point is you can't mention terrorists and money launderers without also mentioning pedophiles. Together they form the "general excuse" for making life more difficult for everyone else.
  • colsten
    colsten Posts: 17,597 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    GingerBob wrote: »
    The point is you can't mention terrorists and money launderers without also mentioning pedophiles.
    You can, and I did.
  • GingerBob_3
    GingerBob_3 Posts: 3,659 Forumite
    colsten wrote: »
    You can, and I did.


    Yes, but you got it wrong.


    Seriously though, isn't it a fact that whenever banks, the government or any other element of the Establishment wish to impose some sort of restriction or surveillance measure they all-too-readily jump to the pedophile/money launder/terrorist excuse for doing so?
  • colsten
    colsten Posts: 17,597 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Which world are you living in? One without international drug dealers and terrorists? Wouldn't we all like to.

    No need to answer, as this is my last comment in this thread. You are on my blocked list now, anyway, GingerBob, as I am no longer interested in reading what you say.
  • GingerBob_3
    GingerBob_3 Posts: 3,659 Forumite
    colsten wrote: »
    Which world are you living in? One without international drug dealers and terrorists? Wouldn't we all like to.

    No need to answer, as this is my last comment in this thread. You are on my blocked list now, anyway, GingerBob, as I am no longer interested in reading what you say.




    Good. And good riddance to you.
  • Ben8282
    Ben8282 Posts: 4,821 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Newshound!
    It can do no harm to tell your bank in advance.
    Another thought. If there is anything that you want from your bank, the time when all that money is sitting in your account might be the best time to ask for it ......
  • cheesetoast
    cheesetoast Posts: 258 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 100 Posts Combo Breaker Name Dropper
    If you're revising £170,000 worth of investments, are you using a financial adviser?

    And if so, can't they move the money through their client account for you?
  • Anthorn
    Anthorn Posts: 4,362 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    oldwiring wrote: »
    Shortly my wife and I will be revising our investments and that will mean large amounts passing through our accounts.

    In view of some of the tales of suspended accounts is it a good idea to inform the bank before the transactions commence?They could stretch over a couple of months.

    Depends on where the money is coming from and to a lesser extent on where it's going. For example if the money is being transferred from a U.K. financial institution you don't have anything to worry about so no need to tell the bank in advance. But if it's paid in in cash start worrying now. Also pay attention to the Bank's limits with regard to deposits.
  • callum9999
    callum9999 Posts: 4,436 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I find the suggestion that if a bank blocks your accounts as they suspect money laundering you can get it unblocked just by saying "I'm not money laundering" quite hard to believe - same for doing that pre-emptively.

    If they decide to block the account/investigate, surely they'll want documentary proof and not just an unsubstantiated assurance? Otherwise, why can't a money launderer just do the exact same thing?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.