POPLA appeal and a few question

yy2uker

Hi, it seems that we are facing the similar case, my UKPC friend was even lying to BPA, saying POPLA was provided via email, so I missed the deadline for POPLA appeal, got a debt recovery letter demanding £150 for parking at allocated space where I rented.

Coupon-mad

I'm going to suggest a new tactic of adding a point saying that a more relevant binding Court of Appeal decision is Vine v Waltham Forest (yes I know it's a clamping case & not quite the same thing) but it's a useful one about a driver not seeing a sign at all, therefore not assuming the risk or knowing of the terms they would be bound by - and it says the driver could not have seen the signs from the driving seat which is useful in lots of cases we see here. Mentioned in this one:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/70322846#Comment_70322846

Also in the unclear signage point, say the driver did not see the signs or any terms or amend it completely to be more of a generalised and detailed argument that no contract was formed with Ethical on a daily basis anyway. You seem to have missed the point of my earlier post #6 and just gone for a generic set of points instead.

4stars

Coupon-mad wrote: »

I'm going to suggest a new tactic of adding a point saying that a more relevant binding Court of Appeal decision is Vine v Waltham Forest (yes I know it's a clamping case & not quite the same thing) but it's a useful one about a driver not seeing a sign at all, therefore not assuming the risk or knowing of the terms they would be bound by - and it says the driver could not have seen the signs from the driving seat which is useful in lots of cases we see here.

Thank you CM for your comments. Don't know how relevant above is in the case of an imported LHD.