We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Harder now for 1st time buyers?
Comments
-
It's cant go on like this then. Something has to change. Why for example is a house you live in exempt from capital gains tax. I know the argument against is that people wouldn't sell because thay'd have to pay huge tax payments but I'm not sure hats true. Just thinking out the box here.
Maybe I'm wrong and the younger generations always get screwed over by the older.0 -
I'd say in London it's probably the hardest it's been, but it's been hard in the past I couldn't afford to buy in London in the early 70s but prices were high then not as high as now but a lot higher than 20 years ago.0
-
You are, consider someone downsizing. I've been in my house 30years in that time the price has increased £300k so if I sold I would have to pay £56k in tax so what would be the point of downsizing that plus moving fees would mean I'd need a mortgage if I downsized.0
-
always_sunny wrote: »A professional couple in London should be able to bring home £100k combined, there are plenty of 1bed that are less than 4x this amount. Not in Zone 2 but surely in Zone 4+ within 30 min of central London....
First of all, that still requires both people to be earning almost twice the average wage. Sure, it's do-able if you're both professionals, but unless you are exceptionally lucky and talented and go into a very well-paid career, you're likely to be a good few years out of uni before you start earning that kind of money. And if you're earning quite a lot less than that AND paying off your student loan AND renting in London, you won't have that much disposable income from which to save a deposit.
So perhaps if you're in a couple and both of you have high salaries, you might be able to buy a one bed flat for £400k by the time you're 30. And then what? Have a child? But you live in a one bed flat. Whoops.
And that's before you consider the fact that not everyone is in a relationship or able to buy jointly with someone else. So single people are effectively doomed to be renters forever, and people in unhappy relationships who have bought a place together will effectively not be able to afford to break up.
I come from quite a middle class background and my mum worked part-time on a very low salary. My dad's salary effectively supported the whole family. He was just a normal, reasonably well-paid office worker, not a CEO. That would never happen now.0 -
You are, consider someone downsizing. I've been in my house 30years in that time the price has increased £300k so if I sold I would have to pay £56k in tax so what would be the point of downsizing that plus moving fees would mean I'd need a mortgage if I downsized.
What tax? You don't pay capital gains tax when you sell your primary residence.0 -
My wife and I are mid-30s, we get by on 1.5 income, but when we bought our first home 9 years ago we needed a double salary.
House prices where we bought are almost 50% higher than when we first bought; and I doubt salaries have gone up like that - so I'm rather sure things have got considerably harder.
All these government schemes only go to fuel prices. They've not stimulated house building like they were meant to. London and the South East needs to either expand, or build upwards.0 -
littlegreenfrog wrote: »What tax? You don't pay capital gains tax when you sell your primary residence.
That's the point they're making. If they had to pay CGT they wouldn't move.0 -
littlegreenfrog wrote: »What tax? You don't pay capital gains tax when you sell your primary residence.
He is replying to someone suggesting that you should.0 -
ringo_24601 wrote: »
All these government schemes only go to fuel prices. They've not stimulated house building like they were meant to. London and the South East needs to either expand, or build upwards.
Like all these Tory schemes, they do precisely what they were meant to. Fuel house prices and result in increased profits for big house builders.0 -
Bluebirdman_of_Alcathays wrote: »Why would you have to pay £56k in tax?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards