We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Seller has used my pictures
Comments
-
None of this surprises me, the people we sold to would have murdered their grandmother for a tenner, they were that tight.
Which just makes it even more likely that they've used a cheap list-on-RM-and-field-calls-only online agent, so the vendor's supplied the pics themselves.
<shrug> They'll find the place more difficult to sell than if they'd tidied it up and used accurate pics. Is that enough of a karmic slap on the wrist to satisfy your sense of outraged injustice?0 -
Life's too short, move on.0
-
Which just makes it even more likely that they've used a cheap list-on-RM-and-field-calls-only online agent, so the vendor's supplied the pics themselves.
<shrug> They'll find the place more difficult to sell than if they'd tidied it up and used accurate pics. Is that enough of a karmic slap on the wrist to satisfy your sense of outraged injustice?
Well it's already sold, so the lucky buyer obviously didn't mind that the house was vastly different from the pics.0 -
-
I would consider the use of pictures taken years ago as 'misrepresentation' of the true facts.0
-
Well you could say it got them through the door.
If I was the buyer and it looked so different, I would walk out of principle, or a large discount at the least"It is prudent when shopping for something important, not to limit yourself to Pound land/Estate Agents"
G_M/ Bowlhead99 RIP0 -
Well you could say it got them through the door.
Does it really matter? Whoever bought it wouldn't be having your furniture, or the current vendors furniture in the property. They're buying the house, not it's contents."Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
