📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Pensions: George Osborne to drop tax relief plans

«1345678

Comments

  • Zanderman
    Zanderman Posts: 4,896 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    d70cw6 wrote: »

    Not sure that any God played much of a part!

    Much more likely that thanks (if it should be thanks) are to the vested interests and resistance to change in the pensions industry and to fears that the changes would annoy higher rate tax payers.

    As a basic rate tax payer the proposals looked fairly interesting, depending, of course, on the detail.
  • RickyB2000
    RickyB2000 Posts: 321 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Doesn't surprise me that much. My instinct said nothing would change, though of course I didn't know for sure. However, it was fun speculating!
  • TheTracker
    TheTracker Posts: 1,223 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Nothing like 4 threads on the same topic.
    No doubt some MSE person will make another one soon.
  • RickyB2000
    RickyB2000 Posts: 321 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    This is probably news worth starting a new thread for, rather than adding to the other threads that are all over the place with regards to speculative changes
  • peterg1965
    peterg1965 Posts: 2,164 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If this comes to pass on 16th March and tax relief and salary sacrifice remain untouched, I will be buying a bottle of champagne to celebrate!

    A step too far for GO and he risked upsetting the people he needs to support him in his aspiration to become Prime Minister for a couple of terms after DC. Politics and common sense rule the day!
  • The tax relief on pensions requires modifying and I was sure a Tory Chancellor wasn't going to make major changes, as it's yet another perk for the middle classes. He probably will revisit it but with another set of proposals. A classic case of feeding "info"/rumours, then putting forward what you actually intended to do, making you look like you're compromising by listening to all interested parties.
  • david78
    david78 Posts: 1,654 Forumite
    He may still tweak the limits though.
  • JoeCrystal
    JoeCrystal Posts: 3,335 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Well, that was very disappointing! :(
  • buglawton
    buglawton Posts: 9,246 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Yes, after making changes to buy to let that favour multi-property companies over small landlords, Osborne has been leant on by his colleagues not to commit a similar faux pas over pensions. Lately he's been doing his best to make UKIP (or even the Libdems) more electable.

    Trouble is, if the conservatives win the next election, or a Brexit pushes Cameron off his perch, an emboldened Osborne might come back for another attack on retirement plans.
  • peterg1965
    peterg1965 Posts: 2,164 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The tax relief on pensions requires modifying and I was sure a Tory Chancellor wasn't going to make major changes, as it's yet another perk for the middle classes. He probably will revisit it but with another set of proposals. A classic case of feeding "info"/rumours, then putting forward what you actually intended to do, making you look like you're compromising by listening to all interested parties.

    I don't really get the 'perk for the middle classes argument'. Millions more middle income earners pay the higher rate tax and nothing has ever been don over the last decade or so to arrest this fiscal drag. Higher rate tax relief for pensions is a small way of making up for the middle classes taking on an increased tax burden.

    I would advocate no tax relief at all for those earning over £125-£150k+ . It might not increase tax revenue that much, but those people genuinely are wealthy, are likely to have more options open to them and therefore should shoulder some more of the burden. Couple this move with getting rid of the 45% additional tax rate and it makes it a palatable move for high earners, all in my opinion of course.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.