We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
website speed
Options

earthgirl
Posts: 3,762 Forumite

in Techie Stuff
Hi, I'm not sure if I am allowed to ask on here, but I post all the time over on the mf wannabe board.
Would a few of you mind checking out our website for speed? I'm specifically looking for info on whether it would be worth paying a company to recode the webpage to make it all load faster. It's hard with so many images, and I am not sure wether its too slow.
http://www.northernferrarihire.com
Please remove if I am not allowed to ask this
Would a few of you mind checking out our website for speed? I'm specifically looking for info on whether it would be worth paying a company to recode the webpage to make it all load faster. It's hard with so many images, and I am not sure wether its too slow.
http://www.northernferrarihire.com
Please remove if I am not allowed to ask this

15/5/12 Paid off Mortgage 1 (£220k) Bought Dream House:www: Dec 13 - Mortage 2 -£116,508. 15/7/18 Mortgage Free Again :j
Progress not Perfection
Progress not Perfection
0
Comments
-
Load speed is fine for me. Can I get my free Ferrari now?“Learn from the mistakes of others. You can never live long enough to make them all yourself.”
― Groucho Marx0 -
Likewise loads quick enough .
No i don't want a Ferrari .0 -
-
It loads fine.
"Code" is very rarely the problem with website performance. The content is. On an image intensive website, it'll take a sec to load. One other obvious mistake people make is including the entire jquery library, or loats of off-site includes ...
Your site, I had a check of the source code, is basically fine. There's a lot of includes and some of the styling is a bit weird (maybe a symptom of the wordpress integration) but it's reasonable.
HOWEVER..
As you asked,
There's a reasonable security issue I'd get sorted. there seems to be commented output of the vast majority of your database schema available..
For example:
Total query time: 0.1846
SQL info:
# | Time (s) | Caching (Reject reason) | Status | Data size (b) | Query
1 | 0.0026 | enabled | cached | 4207 | SELECT id, name, date_c
FROM nfh_layerslider
WHERE flag_hidden = '0' AND flag_deleted = '0'
ORDER BY date_c ASC LIMIT 999
2 | 0.0016 | enabled | cached | 3540 | SELECT t.*, tt.* FROM nfh_terms AS t INNER JOIN nfh_term_taxonomy AS tt ON t.term_id = tt.term_id WHERE tt.taxonomy IN ('link_category') AND tt.count > 0 ORDER BY t.name ASC
3 | 0.0014 | enabled | cached | 9279 | SELECT * FROM nfh_postmeta a, nfh_posts b WHERE a.`post_id` = b.`ID` AND b.`post_status` != 'trash' AND ( a.`meta_key` = '_pprredirect_active' OR a.`meta_key` = '_pprredirect_rewritelink' OR a.`meta_key` = '_pprredirect_newwindow' OR a.`meta_key` = '_pprredirect_relnofollow' OR a.`meta_key` = '_pprredirect_type' OR a.`meta_key` = '_pprredirect_url') ORDER BY a.`post_id` ASC;
4 | 0.0012 | enabled | not cached | 5411 | SELECT nfh_redirection_items.*,nfh_redirection_groups.position AS group_pos FROM nfh_redirection_items INNER JOIN nfh_redirection_groups ON nfh_redirection_groups.id=nfh_redirection_items.group_id AND nfh_redirection_groups.status='enabled' AND nfh_redirection_groups.module_id=1 WHERE (nfh_redirection_items.regex=1 OR nfh_redirection_items.url='/')
5 | 0.0022 | enabled | not cached | 11426 | SELECT nfh_posts.* FROM nfh_posts WHERE 1=1 AND nfh_posts.ID = 6 AND nfh_posts.post_type = 'page' ORDER BY nfh_posts.post_date DESC
6 | 0.0029 | enabled | not cached | 10982 | SELECT post_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM nfh_postmeta WHERE post_id IN (6) ORDER BY meta_id ASC
7 | 0.0021 | enabled | not cached | 7940 | SELECT * FROM nfh_posts WHERE (post_type = 'page' AND post_status = 'publish') AND post_parent = 6 ORDER BY nfh_posts.post_title ASC LIMIT 0,1
8 | 0.0015 | enabled | cached | 1552 | SELECT tr.object_id FROM nfh_term_relationships AS tr INNER JOIN nfh_term_taxonomy AS tt ON tr.term_taxonomy_id = tt.term_taxonomy_id WHERE tt.taxonomy IN ('nav_menu') AND tt.term_id IN ('2') ORDER BY tr.object_id ASC
There's tonnes of this in there. I'd definitely ask that all of that (coming from some 3rd party optimisation engine) should NOT be in any productionised webpages ...
DaveHello There. :beer:0 -
Is your site on shared hosting? If it is and you get intermittant slow running it might be worth raising a support ticket with your hosting company. Wordpress suffers badly when the database server gets overloaded and your host will probably be quite happy to switch your site to a different server.0
-
Very fast at mine. Don't suppose Ferrari do bikes? :cool:0
-
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 256.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards