We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Potential House Re-wire - who's responsible?

13»

Comments

  • TBagpuss wrote: »
    I don't think so. They would ask for a certificate for any works which the seller declares they have had carried out, but it is not the seller's responsibility to carry out an electrical survey or inspection or to provide a certificate. And it would normally be the surveyor, not the solicitor, who would recommend having your own electrical survey or checks carried out.

    The solicitor acting on behalf of our house's purchaser was obviously more thorough than your's because they requested an electrical certificate and if one wasn't provided this would have given cause for the purchaser to renegotiate the purchase price.
    “Learn from the mistakes of others. You can never live long enough to make them all yourself.”
    ― Groucho Marx
  • Davesnave
    Davesnave Posts: 34,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The solicitor acting on behalf of our house's purchaser [STRIKE]was obviously more thorough than your's because they requested[/STRIKE] talked me into providing an electrical certificate [STRIKE]and [/STRIKE] by claiming if one wasn't provided this would have given cause for the purchaser to renegotiate the purchase price.

    I've corrected that for you.

    Obviously, the intricacies of every sale will be different, but if no work has been carried out, it's not generally expected that an owner will provide an electrical certificate. That's all part of the extras beyond the survey, including matters like drains, specialist timber & damp and central heating checks.
  • I think the OP comment on cash buyer in the original post may be important.

    Most of us purchase with a mortgage. Your solicitor acts for both you and your lender. The lender will stipulate lots of things such as a valuation, all the surveys, buildings certificates from extensions etc etc.

    If you are paying cash, there is no lender so the solicitor acts for you only. The solicitor is paid to do what the client wants and could include completing on a wreck.
  • Davesnave wrote: »
    I've corrected that for you.

    Obviously, the intricacies of every sale will be different, but if no work has been carried out, it's [STRIKE]not [/STRIKE]generally expected that an owner will provide an electrical certificate. [STRIKE]That's all part of the extras beyond the survey, including matters like drains, specialist timber & damp and central heating checks.[/STRIKE]

    Thanks for your editing. I suppose it depends on the professionalism of the solicitor and the searches they are prepared to undergo. Our purchaser's solicitor even asked for evidence of the council's permission for my father to build an extension over the sewer outlet some forty years prior. The solicitor acting on your behalf is is the last line of defence and if this isn't common practice it is evident it should be.
    “Learn from the mistakes of others. You can never live long enough to make them all yourself.”
    ― Groucho Marx
  • Davesnave
    Davesnave Posts: 34,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Thanks for your editing. I suppose it depends on the professionalism of the solicitor and the searches they are prepared to undergo. Our purchaser's solicitor even asked for evidence of the council's permission for my father to build an extension over the sewer outlet some forty years prior. The solicitor acting on your behalf is is the last line of defence and if this isn't common practice it is evident it should be.

    Solicitors can ask for whatever they like. Sometimes, they get lucky. At other times, the vendor, following what is common practice, will turn around and do a Charles De Gaulle (1967) because they feel confident.

    It's all part of that rich tapestry which is negotiation.
  • phil24_7
    phil24_7 Posts: 1,535 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    tired_dad wrote: »
    I think the OP comment on cash buyer in the original post may be important.

    Most of us purchase with a mortgage. Your solicitor acts for both you and your lender. The lender will stipulate lots of things such as a valuation, all the surveys, buildings certificates from extensions etc etc.

    If you are paying cash, there is no lender so the solicitor acts for you only. The solicitor is paid to do what the client wants and could include completing on a wreck.

    When buying the house, a solicitor appointed by you, works solely for you. If he was working for both there would be a conflict of interests. If a re-mortgage, you may accept the lenders solicitor as you should have already done your checks. This solicitor is working solely for the lender.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.