We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Owning a house outright and renting in another city can I get hb?
Comments
-
You won't be able to get housing benefit so why not try and sell? That way you will be able to afford to buy a new property in a different city.0
-
happenstance wrote: »Well even if I wanted to let it out I couldn't afford the gas check and walk that other stuff to make it letable.
I'd only let it to professionals anyway and I've tried with no luck.
Yet you expect someone to let you a property whilst claiming housing benefit?0 -
do you see the irony in how you'll only let to professionals, despite wanting someone else to let a property to you, relying on benefits?!?!:rotfl:0
-
If you read through some of the other posts this person has started, I'd say it's fairly plain to see they are trolling.Metranil dreams of becoming a neon,You don't even take him seriously,How am I going to get to heaven?,When I'm just balanced so precariously..0
-
Metranil_Vavin wrote: »If you read through some of the other posts this person has started, I'd say it's fairly plain to see they are trolling.
Complaining because the Jobcentre expect him to work full time - that was a classic!0 -
You won't be able to get housing benefit so why not try and sell? That way you will be able to afford to buy a new property in a different city.
Is it realistic to expect someone to sell their only home, and risk being homeless in a strange town if they couldn't find work?“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair0 -
Glen_Clark wrote: »From what he has said, the sale of his home would not raise enough to buy somewhere in a place he might find work.
Is it realistic to expect someone to sell their only home, and risk being homeless in a strange town if they couldn't find work?
Why would they be homeless? They own the home outright so would have funds to either rent or buy in another city. I'm sure someone in their position would be able to get work easier than someone who has too factor in rent or mortgage when considering what a job pays.0 -
Glen_Clark wrote: »From what he has said, the sale of his home would not raise enough to buy somewhere in a place he might find work.
Is it realistic to expect someone to sell their only home, and risk being homeless in a strange town if they couldn't find work?
It is reasonable to assume the sale proceeds would cover many months rent in said strange town.0 -
happenstance wrote: »Well do its not perfectly usable as it's in a deprived area with no jobs.
But you could rent it out and use the money to rent somewhere yourself.(AKA HRH_MUngo)
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards