We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

First time buy not a first time buy

I'm wondering if anyone can offer any advice in my situation.
I took out a mortgage when I was 20 for my mum as she couldn't get one at the time(unwell). She unfortunately hasn't got better so never got the chance to take it back on, so I have held it in my name ever since.
I'm now looking to buy my 'first home' 8 years later, unfortunately for any of the first time buyer situations I don't qualify from my understanding?
I'm now worried I'll come under the new rules meaning I'll pay an extra 3% when I purchase. Another £4-5k onto my purchase price. So as well as missing out on the potential boost from the government they're going to charge me more as well?
Can someone clarify for me if that is the case as neither will be rented but I'm guessing it will just be classed as a second home?
Thank you in advance!
[FONT=georgia, bookman old style, palatino linotype, book antiqua, palatino, trebuchet ms, helvetica, garamond, sans-serif, arial, verdana, avante garde, century gothic, comic sans ms, times, times new roman, serif]A bank is a place that will lend you money if you can prove that you don't need it
[/FONT]
«13

Comments

  • buglawton
    buglawton Posts: 9,246 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If your name has ever been on the deeds/the Land Registry for a previous property then I guess that prevents you being a first time buyer.
  • marliepanda
    marliepanda Posts: 7,186 Forumite
    edited 17 February 2016 at 2:44AM
    Yes it is your second house so you will pay the extra. It is not related to BTL at all, simply second houses. You say neither are rented, but you won't be living with your mother (if you are currently) so having a residential mortgage on your mothers property will not be appropriate.

    As you currently have a house (and I assume mortgage) you are not a first time buyer.
  • Seems like you are already a homeowner.

    How quickly can you buy a second house? You still have 6 weeks to beat the Chancellor.
  • Pixie5740
    Pixie5740 Posts: 14,515 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    buglawton wrote: »
    If your name has ever been on the deeds/the Land Registry for a previous property then I guess that prevents you being a first time buyer.

    Some lenders grant you your house buying virginity back if you've not held a mortgage for X number of years although this doesn't apply to the OP since he appears to still be named on a mortgage.

    No good deed goes unpunished. I wouldn't worry too much about missing out on the HTB schemes (schemes being the operative word) although the HTB ISA might have been nice if you were buying further down the line. It does sound as though you're going to get hit with the additional SDLT though.
  • buglawton
    buglawton Posts: 9,246 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Osborne does not seem capable of inventing a tax that doesn't create collateral damage. I'm looking forward to seeing the back of him.
  • If you have sufficient income to get a second mortgage while still being wholly responsible for your first mortgage, then you don't sound like a person who needs financial help from the government, to be honest. Whatever reason you bought that first house for, you bought it and you own it. If you are wealthy enough to buy a second, the help for first time buyers is really not designed for you.
  • peld
    peld Posts: 57 Forumite
    buglawton wrote: »
    Osborne does not seem capable of inventing a tax that doesn't create collateral damage. I'm looking forward to seeing the back of him.

    in fairness, it has to be like that. Taxes sometimes arent fair. There will be some people who fall in an unfortunate situation. Whilst it sounds like the OP had good intentions, think of the other people who'd try and get round the system with "family members" in their "other" properties.

    Looking at it in black & white, the OP can afford to buy a second home and not even receive rent on the first.
  • System
    System Posts: 178,424 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    buglawton wrote: »
    Osborne does not seem capable of inventing a tax that doesn't create collateral damage. I'm looking forward to seeing the back of him.
    No chancellor, regardless of party could do that.

    Any tax change will always have winners and losers.

    Yet another cheap point scoring attempt
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • I assume you've checked if you be able to get a mortgage whilst still paying your mother's?

    As for schemes...sorry to say no you won't qualify as you've had (still got) a mortgage, but as a result it will be classed as a second home.
  • pinkteapot
    pinkteapot Posts: 8,044 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Have you spoken to a mortgage broker?

    Even if your mum is paying the mortgage payments, lenders will still take that existing mortgage off for your affordability calculations if it's a normal residential mortgage. You may end up having to convert it to a BTL mortgage, unless your salary is so high you can borrow the total of the two mortgages...
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.