We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Does engine size matter?

13»

Comments

  • facade wrote: »
    Don't they need ferociously expensive fluids blended from rare oils, plus some sort of special tool to fill them up, so the owner of a 40,000 miler would never pay that much money as it is a significant proportion of the value of the car?
    It can be changed without a tool, they are filled upside down as the filler is also the drain plug at the bottom (brilliant design!)

    facade wrote: »
    Never ceases to amaze me how manufacturers can "improve" something that has worked perfectly well for years, and make it break quicker, yet somehow sell us the idea that the "improvements" have made it "better" :D

    Mostly in aid of efficiency. Once you can lock a TC up so tight it transmits more torque, it then needs similar damping to a clutch/flywheel arrangement. And if you need a stop/start arrangement you also need a secondary oil pump and added complexity.
  • Thanks everyone, that's been (mostly) reassuring. I'll arrange some test drives.
  • agrinnall
    agrinnall Posts: 23,344 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I would check what power output the Focus has, I haven't driven one but I have a Fiesta with a 125 bhp 1.0 ecoboost, it's got easily enough power for my car, but I would suspect that the standard 100 bhp engine in a heavier car might be an issue.
  • agrinnall wrote: »
    I would check what power output the Focus has, I haven't driven one but I have a Fiesta with a 125 bhp 1.0 ecoboost, it's got easily enough power for my car, but I would suspect that the standard 100 bhp engine in a heavier car might be an issue.
    My Mk IV Cortina estate was absolutely fine with the standard 1.6 engine - producing a whopping 73bhp. It would do 60 in a little over a quarter of a minute and with luck and a hill behind you, it would hit an indicated 100 miles per hour. Apparently...
  • forgotmyname
    forgotmyname Posts: 32,957 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The Cortina was not geared to do 130 - 150mph though, my book says 94mph top speed on the 1.6. So the lower power and weight was matched to lower gearing which required less torque.

    It was also fairly light compared to a modern Fiesta, Lighter than the 1.2 petrol and even the 1L ecoboost which claims to have a tiny lightweight engine but weighs much the same as the 1.2 petrol.
    Maybe they forgot the weight of the turbo etc?
    Censorship Reigns Supreme in Troll City...

This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.