We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

£35k investment

Where should I invest £35,000 to get the best rate of return?

Comments

  • Eco_Miser
    Eco_Miser Posts: 5,062 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Over what period, and at what risk?
    Eco Miser
    Saving money for well over half a century
  • badger09
    badger09 Posts: 11,811 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Where should I invest £35,000 to get the best rate of return?

    Do you mean invest or save?

    Whichever you mean, you'll need to provide more information if you expect any useful comments.
  • Please answer the above questions.

    As ever, zero risk such as a savings account means poor returns, high risk means potentially high returns, often greatly so. But to get the high returns you need to invest for the long term, and realise that you might not be able to access the money whenever you want, due to market crashes for example.
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 40,706 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    As ever, zero risk such as a savings account....
    As ever, there is no such thing as zero risk! Savings accounts (subject to FSCS of course) offer zero risk of capital loss but do suffer from inflation risk and shortfall risk, so it's inaccurate to portray savings as zero risk, even if these risks may be lower than investment risks, dependent on a range of factors including timescales.
  • BananaRepublic
    BananaRepublic Posts: 2,103 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 14 February 2016 at 5:11PM
    eskbanker wrote: »
    As ever, there is no such thing as zero risk! Savings accounts (subject to FSCS of course) offer zero risk of capital loss but do suffer from inflation risk and shortfall risk, so it's inaccurate to portray savings as zero risk, even if these risks may be lower than investment risks, dependent on a range of factors including timescales.

    Thank you for that piece of pointless academic pedantry. :(
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 40,706 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Thank you for that piece of pointless academic pedantry. :(
    It's not pointless, academic or pedantic actually - in the context of lack of knowledge of OP's objectives then it's overly simplistic to imply that savings are lower risk than investment when it could be exactly the opposite if aiming to accumulate for, say, retirement.
  • Gadfium
    Gadfium Posts: 763 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    As ever, zero risk such as a savings account means poor returns,

    Savings account, yes. Current accounts, no. There's pretty good returns to be had by spreading the dosh across multiple high-interest current accounts.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.