Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Add another BTL now or wait after April rush?

2

Comments

  • michaels wrote: »
    I think it is a false market that the moment due to the tax change...but then going forward the supply/demand fundamentals remain very supportive so who knows....

    Obviously currently it is nice that standard rate taxpayers won't be taxed on turnover but the fact that they have made one change towards taxation of turnover makes me nervous about what else they might do.


    You could be right, who knows what else is planned, but closing off a massive industry seems crazy to me. Maybe waiting is better, see if anything more in the March Budget, even heard rumors of some lobbying by accountants to delay the stamp duty changes as they can't give answer to clients until maybe a couple of weeks before the deadline, daft situation. will make them look massively incompetent so I can't see it happening.
  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,133 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Generali wrote: »
    It's yo pension yo messin' wid.

    Overweight Anglo? Sheeesh.

    Dunno - some sort of medium risk international and uk growth fund - in other words slight underperformance of the world index and a hefty charge for the priviledge but there only seems to be a choice of 3 funds through my work pension, 'low risk', 'medium risk' and 'adventurous' and of course the pension company does well whichever you choose. I have this hopeful view that a might see 2% pa real terms growth after fees by the time I retire but I am not convinced that I haven't paid in more over the last 20 years than the fund is currently worth in nominal terms let alone in real terms :(
    I think....
  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,133 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Glover1862 wrote: »
    You could be right, who knows what else is planned, but closing off a massive industry seems crazy to me. Maybe waiting is better, see if anything more in the March Budget, even heard rumors of some lobbying by accountants to delay the stamp duty changes as they can't give answer to clients until maybe a couple of weeks before the deadline, daft situation. will make them look massively incompetent so I can't see it happening.

    I wouldn't take my advice, I decided that the risk reward balance dictated selling my btl before the election last year so have missed out on 10% plus capital growth since last May :(
    I think....
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    michaels wrote: »
    Dunno - some sort of medium risk international and uk growth fund - in other words slight underperformance of the world index and a hefty charge for the priviledge but there only seems to be a choice of 3 funds through my work pension, 'low risk', 'medium risk' and 'adventurous' and of course the pension company does well whichever you choose. I have this hopeful view that a might see 2% pa real terms growth after fees by the time I retire but I am not convinced that I haven't paid in more over the last 20 years than the fund is currently worth in nominal terms let alone in real terms :(

    Don't tell my boss I said this but most research shows that if you minimise your TER then you maximise your returns in the long term on average.

    Money has been flying into index funds across the world for the last 15 years. The dot com crash and the Equitable Life debacle removed any confidence boomers had in asset managers.
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    michaels wrote: »
    I wouldn't take my advice, I decided that the risk reward balance dictated selling my btl before the election last year so have missed out on 10% plus capital growth since last May :(

    Always leave something on the table for the next guy.
  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    Generali wrote: »
    Xstrata

    Please don't mention that name (or Anglo American)

    I still get flashbacks :eek: and it was 7 or 8 years ago.............
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Glover1862 wrote: »
    You could be right, who knows what else is planned, but closing off a massive industry seems crazy to me.

    What massive industry? Highly leveraged LL's hardly generate huge amounts of revenue for the Treasury nor do they more importantly create jobs.
  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    What massive industry? Highly leveraged LL's hardly generate huge amounts of revenue for the Treasury nor do they more importantly create jobs.

    I believe you are entitled to call something an "industry" as long as you can dredge up a spokesperson to represent it on breakfast telly or similar.
  • Fair few letting agents and maintenance firms might regret the the passing of BTL, must be quite a few other jobs connected to BTL. Fairly large tax take I would think, CGT, SD, income tax, particularly as lots BTL are owned cash. They also bought a fair few new builds
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,793 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Generali wrote: »
    Always leave something on the table for the next guy.

    I like that saying, a friend of mine who used to go racecourse booking with me, and worked in the city, used to say 'feed the ducks while they are quacking'. It was a reference to laying a horse when everyone is falling over themselves to back it, the tendency is to shut up shop and try reduce the odds to lay it shorter, his point was, lay it now. Because sometimes they drift back out again, it was more apt prior to betfair (betfair gives bookies an out, providing they keep an eye on the market of course).
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.