We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Long Lease - 7 flats

I'm offering up some advice to a client on the acquisition of a long leasehold interest which is being sold by a local housing association. The lease comprises 7 flats above a commercial property - I would describe the lease as being relatively commercial insofar as it does not allow the units to be dealt with individually - ie you cannot sell off the flats as single units.

Whilst it may not be of huge interest for this case - I'd hope we can complete before the rules change, but undoubtedly something I will encounter in the future.

My thoughts are that it is defined as a non-residential property for sdlt rating purposes - because of this rule: -
6 or more residential properties bought in a single transaction

But, I then got on to thinking, what constitutes a property? ie in this instance it's a single long leasehold interest albeit that contains 7 residential units. Thoughts?!

Comments

  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The obvious answer would be that there's a freehold for the building, which consists of a commercial unit (maybe on a lease) on the ground floor and a commercial main lease for the entirety of the seven flats. Each flat is then on a residential sub-lease.

    I'm a bit confused, though, by the fact you're asking some non-professional, unqualified random strangers about such a fundamental detail of the advice you're being paid to professionally give.
  • MrJB
    MrJB Posts: 292 Forumite
    Adrian, thanks for coming back so quickly - most appreciate.

    The extent of my professional advice is limited to my area of expertise - A Commercial Property GP Surveyor - I will be advising on the condition of the building and the likely total cost of refurbishment works and the value of the interest (obviously tempered by the impact of SDLT). I am pretty confident of my position - insofar as there is one commercial long lease which relates to seven dwellings which are all unoccupied and I therefore think SDLT will be charged in accordance with the non-domestic rate rather than the new rate for BTL property.

    My reasoning for asking here was that I thought others may have encountered the way in which HMRC deal with the interest - be it as it appears on the Land Registry ie as one interest. Or as it physically is ie 1 interest consisting of 7 units. Logically I would have to presume the latter but was curious if this was something anyone else had encountered. In any event, so you can rest easy I'm sure that my client will take the appropriate advice from a solicitor/accountant!

    As an aside, you're indeed correct the freehold is also owned by a different client of mine and let on a commercial tenancy.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I'm assuming your client has a solicitor in the purchase, too?
  • MrJB
    MrJB Posts: 292 Forumite
    AdrianC wrote: »
    I'm assuming your client has a solicitor in the purchase, too?

    Your assumption is indeed correct!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.