Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

A Death By Eight Million Cuts

145791012

Comments

  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    Indeed so
    which is why so few people are members of TUs or of the Labour party
    Just over 11 million people voted for Tories in last election, over 6 million workers are members of a trade union so not so few.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ukcarper wrote: »
    Just over 11 million people voted for Tories in last election, over 6 million workers are members of a trade union so not so few.

    in the context of the left 'narrative' of Moby i.e. that labour party and the TU are one and the same, then the numbers tell a different story. Voters for labour don't equate to party members.
    The activist narrative of heroic trade unionist fighting for social justice and that all workers benefits wouldn't be there but for the TUs, doesn't have a resonance with the majority of people today, especially the young.
    If labour want to be relevant to the UK, rather than an activist clique, then they have to engage with 21st century issues and 21st century people. Simply being anti Tory is not good enough.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 9 February 2016 at 3:17PM
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    in the context of the left 'narrative' of Moby i.e. that labour party and the TU are one and the same, then the numbers tell a different story. Voters for labour don't equate to party members.
    The activist narrative of heroic trade unionist fighting for social justice and that all workers benefits wouldn't be there but for the TUs, doesn't have a resonance with the majority of people today, especially the young.
    If labour want to be relevant to the UK, rather than an activist clique, then they have to engage with 21st century issues and 21st century people. Simply being anti Tory is not good enough.


    Less than half of union members are in unions affiliated to Labour.

    You can argue the figures all you like the Labour party has more members than Tory Party but the Tories were still elected al be it with less than 25% of the votes of those eligible to vote.
  • antrobus
    antrobus Posts: 17,386 Forumite
    ukcarper wrote: »
    Can't you opt out of political levy then, I know people in the union I belonged to who did.

    Note Generali's use of "Labor". He's talking about the Australian Labor Party. The rules might be different there.:)
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    antrobus wrote: »
    Note Generali's use of "Labor". He's talking about the Australian Labor Party. The rules might be different there.:)
    yes I gathered that.
  • antrobus
    antrobus Posts: 17,386 Forumite
    Here's some interesting background.

    A report on a study carried out by Unlock Democracy

    A survey found 14 out of 15 trade unions affiliated to the Labour Party failed to explain to prospective new members that they did not have to pay fees to the party. They also did not inform them that they had a legal right to opt out on their membership forms and website....Unlock Democracy found that only public sector union Unison allowed new members to choose whether to affiliate to Labour or not on their membership form.



    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9580715/Unions-fail-to-inform-members-they-can-opt-out-of-Labour-funding.html
  • antrobus
    antrobus Posts: 17,386 Forumite
    ukcarper wrote: »
    Just over 11 million people voted for Tories in last election, over 6 million workers are members of a trade union so not so few.

    Yes, but the two categories are not mutually exclusive. I presume there must be at least some Tory trade unionists, otherwise they wouldn't have two websites.:)

    http://www.conservativesatwork.org.uk/
    http://www.toryworkers.co.uk/
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    antrobus wrote: »
    Yes, but the two categories are not mutually exclusive. I presume there must be at least some Tory trade unionists, otherwise they wouldn't have two websites.:)

    http://www.conservativesatwork.org.uk/
    http://www.toryworkers.co.uk/
    True I was just responding to Claptons post saying a few people were trade union members.
  • antrobus
    antrobus Posts: 17,386 Forumite
    ukcarper wrote: »
    True I was just responding to Claptons post saying a few people were trade union members.

    I don't think he said that. He said that "The activist narrative of heroic trade unionist fighting for social justice and that all workers benefits wouldn't be there but for the TUs, doesn't have a resonance with the majority of people today, especially the young"

    You could well argue that he was right. Total union membership has fallen, and even amongst those who are members there is sometimes a distinct lack of interest in the union itself.

    Certainly you could say that given that something like 75% of workers are not in a trade union, then clearly they don't resonate with the majority of people.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    Indeed so
    which is why so few people are members of TUs or of the Labour party
    antrobus wrote: »
    I don't think he said that. He said that "The activist narrative of heroic trade unionist fighting for social justice and that all workers benefits wouldn't be there but for the TUs, doesn't have a resonance with the majority of people today, especially the young"

    You could well argue that he was right. Total union membership has fallen, and even amongst those who are members there is sometimes a distinct lack of interest in the union itself.

    Certainly you could say that given that something like 75% of workers are not in a trade union, then clearly they don't resonate with the majority of people.

    I think he did
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.