We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
follow up almost 2 years later?
Comments
-
I am afraid that it isn't a long time at all. These vermin will chase anything if they can scare enough gullible people to pay them to make it worth their while. I faced down a false claim from Excel for the full six years, with the last fishing expedition on their part occurring 5 years and 6 months in (previous "rules" - no keeper liability and essentially made up rubbish in any case).secret_squirrel85 wrote: »Ok thanks. Just more empty threats? Was just surprised they decided to chase it again after such a long time.Under no circumstances may any part of my postings be used, quoted, repeated, transferred or published by any third party in ANY medium outside of this website without express written permission. Thank you.0 -
Who do DR+ intend to take to court and on what basis. It appears they may be implying or even claiming the RK is liable.
Is this the case?This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
Would this apply to a parking charge issued in April 2013 in England? I had the same experience as the OP and have just got another letter from them.0
-
speedypete2022 wrote: »Would this apply to a parking charge issued in April 2013 in England? I had the same experience as the OP and have just got another letter from them.
Of course. You've had a desperate Debt Recovery letter mentioning a landmark decision haven't you?
Search the forum for 'Debt Recovery Plus landmark'.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
It would seem that they are implying that the registered keeper is liable. I should make it clear that debt recovery plus aren't threatening to take anyone to court. Rather that they will simply recommended to "their client" that they should take court action. It's possibly worth mentioning that there has been no letters from their client (highview parking) since very early on.
I'll suggest to the recipient of the letters that they just ignore them. Hopefully they get bored eventually0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards