We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!

House bought, cheating partner, recovering deposit share?

Brother in law recently bought house with g/f and their 1 child who he is main carer for as she is the sole worker.

they got mortgage but in her name and her name on deeds of house. he put £10k in towards deposit.

turns out she was cheating, he's moved out but is still main carer for child because of her work pattern.

where does he stand for reclaiming deposit share? and are there any other things to consider given the above? '

thanks

Comments

  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    where does he stand for reclaiming deposit share?
    ======

    Between a rock and a hard place.
  • HappyMJ
    HappyMJ Posts: 21,115 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Iamdave wrote: »
    Brother in law recently bought house with g/f and their 1 child who he is main carer for as she is the sole worker.

    they got mortgage but in her name and her name on deeds of house. he put £10k in towards deposit.

    turns out she was cheating, he's moved out but is still main carer for child because of her work pattern.

    where does he stand for reclaiming deposit share? and are there any other things to consider given the above? '

    thanks
    Depends on what they agreed when she bought the house.

    Morally she should give the £10k back.

    He did not buy the house with the girlfriend as his name is not on the title or mortgage. He will not therefore be able to force a sale. If she doesn't have the money to give him then the only action he can take is through the court. If he gets judgement and that goes unpaid he can then get a charge placed against the property and when she sells the property he can get his £10k back. As a child is living in the property he cannot force a sale of the property so it could be many many years or even decades before he sees any money. Interest will not be added once he has a charge and he has to declare the charge as an asset every time he applies for benefits which may make him ineligible to get anything at all due to having too much capital.
    :footie:
    :p Regular savers earn 6% interest (HSBC, First Direct, M&S) :p Loans cost 2.9% per year (Nationwide) = FREE money. :p
  • Kynthia
    Kynthia Posts: 5,692 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Without the protection of marriage it was unwise to put £10k into a property he didn't own. Does he have evidence that he contributed this money and did he sign anything for the mortgage lender/solicitor to say the money was a gift?

    I suggest he speak to the ex and if she isn't prepared to return the money or can't afford to then he'll have to speak to a solicitor. He'll need to understand his position. Can he afford to look after the child during the mum's working hours and does it prevent him getting a job to support himself? If he does this and the child doesn't live with him he won't be able to claim the benefits that assist other stay at home parents.
    Don't listen to me, I'm no expert!
  • Iamdave
    Iamdave Posts: 146 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    i'll have to find out if he signed anything, he's notorriously bad when it comes to money though and doesn;t understand the value of a pound mostly as relatives have always bailed him out.

    he's prevented from getting a job himself as he's the stay at home parent as she's a nurse. given her hours it was never worth him getting a job as the cost of child care would undo this.

    what is his position given that she needs him for child care? can he claim child maintenance? he is living back with his parents now.
  • Marvel1
    Marvel1 Posts: 7,478 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Iamdave wrote: »
    i'll have to find out if he signed anything, he's notorriously bad when it comes to money though and doesn;t understand the value of a pound mostly as relatives have always bailed him out.

    In this instance inwould leave him sort out his problem, as you here now asking advice on his behalf.
  • paddy's_mum
    paddy's_mum Posts: 3,977 Forumite
    I've been Money Tipped!
    She has put herself into a very difficult position because if she does not at least attempt to negotiate a financial way forward, he may be forced or feel compelled to withdraw from the childcare arrangement and then how will she be able to sustain a mortgage? If a resale is forced, she stands to lose a lot of money so it may be in her own best interests to show that she is at least trying to be fair.

    As so often in life, it's going to require sitting round the table and trying to amicably work out the least damaging way to progress.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    he needs legal advice although that might be expensive
    who is the child living with?
    in any event he either needs to get a job, state support or maintenance
  • HappyMJ
    HappyMJ Posts: 21,115 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Iamdave wrote: »
    i'll have to find out if he signed anything, he's notorriously bad when it comes to money though and doesn;t understand the value of a pound mostly as relatives have always bailed him out.

    he's prevented from getting a job himself as he's the stay at home parent as she's a nurse. given her hours it was never worth him getting a job as the cost of child care would undo this.

    what is his position given that she needs him for child care? can he claim child maintenance? he is living back with his parents now.

    He could claim child maintenance, the child benefits and the child tax credits if he can prove he has the child in his care. Expect a long drawn out fight though. She has the house and can easily claim your friend is homeless and the child lives with her and your friend just looks after the child whilst she is at work. Living with parents is not considered secure accommodation.
    :footie:
    :p Regular savers earn 6% interest (HSBC, First Direct, M&S) :p Loans cost 2.9% per year (Nationwide) = FREE money. :p
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Morally the case is clear.

    Legally it's as clear as .... mud.

    As others have said, critical factors seem to be

    * was the £10K a loan or a gift?
    * was there any paperwork associated with the £10K?
    * were does the child live? With her, and he collects every day? Or with him?
    * if he withdrew from the child care arrangement (ie just stopped collecting the child, or took the child round to hers and 'dumped' him on her - she'd be in a hard place, and might then negotiate on the £10K
    * if she does not have a spare £10K, then the only way she could get it is by selling the poperty - is that an option he wants to pursue (bearing in mind the points others have made about problems of forcing a sale)?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.