We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
We're aware that some users are currently experiencing errors on the Forum. Our tech team is working to resolve the issue. Thanks for your patience.

Charge for using Nationwide credit card in Las Vegas

... or anywhere else that Nationwide recognises as allowing gambling?

Nationwide are amending their credit card rules from 17 October.

The new terms and conditions state that gambling transactions will be treated as cash advances, and that transactions recognised as made where gambling is carried out will be treated as gambling whether or not the transaction is for gambling purposes.

So, if Nationwide recognise the name of a hotel in Las Vegas as one that has a casino, they could treat payments for rooms, meals, and other purchases as a cash advance - with both charges and interest being payable as a result. :eek:

The charge is going to be 2.5% of the cash advance (minimum £2.50), so once you add on the interest its going to be cheaper to use a card with a 2.75% overseas loading on purchases - unless of course the other cards start using the same definition and treat the purchase as an overseas cash advance!!!

Comments

  • M4RKM
    M4RKM Posts: 5,132 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    i really think that online gambling is what this is for...

    if you pay for a hotel, it is a hotel purchase. I don't think you can buy chips with a credit card TBH
  • dzug
    dzug Posts: 2,260 Forumite
    Scots_Girl wrote: »
    ... or anywhere else that Nationwide recognises as allowing gambling?

    Nationwide are amending their credit card rules from 17 October.

    The new terms and conditions state that gambling transactions will be treated as cash advances, and that transactions recognised as made where gambling is carried out will be treated as gambling whether or not the transaction is for gambling purposes.

    So, if Nationwide recognise the name of a hotel in Las Vegas as one that has a casino, they could treat payments for rooms, meals, and other purchases as a cash advance - with both charges and interest being payable as a result. :eek:

    The charge is going to be 2.5% of the cash advance (minimum £2.50), so once you add on the interest its going to be cheaper to use a card with a 2.75% overseas loading on purchases - unless of course the other cards start using the same definition and treat the purchase as an overseas cash advance!!!

    I believe most of the other cards, if not all, have used the definition Nationwide are changing to for some time. It's been an oversight by Nationwide not to. There are legal reasons in the UK to make it if not mandatory, highly desirable from NW's point of view.

    Whether cards make the charge or not depends on the merchant category code programmed into the EPOS. Different machines at the same outlet can have different category codes - so the casino part of the hotel COULD be treated differently from the rooms part. It won't be the name of the hotel that sparks the charge, but what the EPOS your card goes through is categorised as. (What ACTUALLY happens in las Vegas I've no idea)

    To give an example nearer home, one of my cards gives 1% off fuel - which is implemented as 1% off any purchase in a petrol station. So if I buy groceries with my petrol in Morrisons petrol station, I get 1% off the whole bill. If I buy them in the supermarket on the same site, I don't.
  • rbulph
    rbulph Posts: 547 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    dzug wrote: »
    There are legal reasons in the UK to make it if not mandatory, highly desirable from NW's point of view.

    What are the legal reasons you refer to? I understood that gambling debts were unenforceable, but didn't the government legislate to change that?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.