We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Aberdeen House Prices & Rents thread
Options
Comments
-
Thrugelmir wrote: »The impact is going to felt far wider than just Aberdeen.
I agree with you that the downturn is global and far reaching.
I was responding to the other poster, who insinuated the low oil price was good news (for the rest of the UK). I can understand that viewpoint.0 -
fun4everyone wrote: »I agree with you that the downturn is global and far reaching.
I was responding to the other poster, who insinuated the low oil price was good news (for the rest of the UK). I can understand that viewpoint.
Not sure if it is, savings on petrol won`t be passed on in any meaningful way, and if you don`t have a job you don`t really need petrol anyway, plus the deflation/credit crunch/basic chaos that will result is going to be bad for property prices.0 -
Crashy_Time wrote: »Not sure if it is, savings on petrol won`t be passed on in any meaningful way, and if you don`t have a job you don`t really need petrol anyway, plus the deflation/credit crunch/basic chaos that will result is going to be bad for property prices.
Sounds like someone who catches the bus and therefore hasn't filled up their tank lately.0 -
fun4everyone wrote: »I agree with you that the downturn is global and far reaching.
I was responding to the other poster, who insinuated the low oil price was good news (for the rest of the UK). I can understand that viewpoint.
Low commodity prices will result in smaller pension pots etc. BP and Shell for example generated around 13% of the total dividend paid by FTSE 100 companies in 2015. Many effects are far from being obvious.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Low commodity prices will result in smaller pension pots etc. BP and Shell for example generated around 13% of the total dividend paid by FTSE 100 companies in 2015. Many effects are far from being obvious.
Whilst the effects are not obvious you've picked a negative potential effect. Of course, other companies not having to pay through the nose for diesel will be able to deliver their products more cheaply - maybe they'll be able to afford higher dividends.
If someone is going to be dramatically impacted by reducing BP dividends their pension pot is too small or under diversified.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Many effects are far from being obvious.
especially if one only counts the negatives0 -
-
Crashy_Time wrote: »A bit like telling someone who doesn`t drink anymore that beer is cheap just now......:rotfl:
Yes but you have form in mistakenly thinking that everyone's life is like yours.
Your rent hasn't gone up since you were a lad = nobody else's has either.
You don't have a petrol tank to fill = neither does anyone else.
Maybe your bus fare will get a bit cheaper.0 -
Yes but you have form in mistakenly thinking that everyone's life is like yours.
Your rent hasn't gone up since you were a lad = nobody else's has either.
You don't have a petrol tank to fill = neither does anyone else.
Maybe your bus fare will get a bit cheaper.
The problem here is that you appear to be stating "maybe X will happen, it's possible that Y might happen, and Z could potentially happen".
Others are stating what IS happening and it's happening right now (hence the stockmarket currently).
As for savings being passed on, there was a big bit in the news yesterday that energy companies are failing to pass on the savings. So again, the evidence suggests that all these "maybes" you keep referring to to argue against reality, are not materialising.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »As for savings being passed on, there was a big bit in the news yesterday that energy companies are failing to pass on the savings. .
Well Graham I was paying around £1.40 for fuel a few years ago and now I'm consistently paying just over £1.
So clearly a large part of the savings are being passed on.
As for that impact to the UK economy, PWC have just done a report on it, and they estimate that $50 oil if sustained for several years is worth around 1% more to GDP and roughly 120,000 additional jobs.
So clearly a benefit to consumers and the economy.
Against that of course you have to offset falling tax revenue to the government, which is not particularly material to the UK, but would be huge for Scotland had it gone independent.“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards