Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Borrow your deposit

123468

Comments

  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,077 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Let's take a different tack.
    If a slow stooze, borrowing a deposit and buying a flat in Derby is such a great idea, then why aren't young people doing it?

    Because they haven't heard of loans? Or some other reason?
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,077 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    We do get some commuters, but the price and the time are serious deterrents, and as you say, it'd only be for the better jobs, so that rules out a lot of the population

    Some people I know are able to work from home now, thanks to technology. Really there's no overall need for cities or even towns anymore - or at least in the future

    So Matthew, you're saying that travel is a serious deterrent but no-one needs to travel anymore?
    That's a direct contradiction.
  • System
    System Posts: 178,354 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Young people are deterred by jobs, retirees on the other hand are free-er

    The contradiction is to make it balanced, as London does have an effect on us, though its minor, were not free of travelling yet but tech is beginning to help
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 14 December 2015 at 3:10PM
    lisyloo wrote: »
    No he didn't I did, because some people consider 2 hours to be commutable especially if they only need to be in the office 2 days a week and can work from home.

    Personally like you I'm not keen on it, but some people do it.
    I specifically said for people that don't have to be in the office every day, which is a lot of back office staff.
    If you have to be in the office everyday you have no other choice other than to live in London or commute the amount you are willing to do. I couldn't work from home so I chose to commute if I only had to be in office twice a week I might have moved further out.
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    lisyloo wrote: »
    The first one looks quite nice to me, so I have no issue with the flat itself.
    The major difference is that London has loads of middle/high paid jobs.
    I put my job title in for Derby and got zero matches - now that would be a big problem for me.
    i didn't find much when I googled for main areas of employment in Derby, but my limited research shows that employment prospects (certainly for my area) are the major issue.

    I was just providing evidence of reasonable flats for £65k within 2 hours commute of London rather than find you a job as well. I understand why there would be a c400k premium for the same flat in London.

    The differential indicates most people don't use the East Midlands as a staging post for a daily London commute. If a 4 daily commute suddenly became entirely normal London price would crash.
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    lisyloo wrote: »
    Let's take a different tack.
    If a slow stooze, borrowing a deposit and buying a flat in Derby is such a great idea, then why aren't young people doing it?

    Because they haven't heard of loans? Or some other reason?

    I think one reason is that stoozing isn't mainstream. How many do you know engage in the sport?

    Also houses are cheap and you won't be in your dotage by the time you've saved a deposit.
  • System
    System Posts: 178,354 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    And in these cheaper towns a lot of people resign themselves to dole, out of those that work, a lot still rent and wouldn't know of stoozing
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • System
    System Posts: 178,354 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I even suspect its the limits on housing benefit that set house prices in some places - what's acceptable to a landlord
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,077 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    wotsthat wrote: »
    I was just providing evidence of reasonable flats for £65k within 2 hours commute of London rather than find you a job as well?

    My definition of reasonable included reasonable employment prospects in post #43.
    For most of us it HAS to because we need to work, so I'm afraid a flat without a job doesn't work for me or most of the population.
    The £450k flat with a good Job despite being stratospheric for a modest down market flat, is actually more viable than a £65k flat with no job.
    Yes I know there are cheaper properties in areas with fewer jobs (or fewer good jobs) which is great for retired people but no good for anyone working.

    Of course I could get a low paid job and move to Derby or up north.
    I would not choose that and neither would millions of others which is why the house prices are low there I.e. Demand.
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,077 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    ukcarper wrote: »
    If you have to be in the office everyday you have no other choice other than to live in London or commute the amount you are willing to do. I couldn't work from home so I chose to commute if I only had to be in office twice a week I might have moved further out.

    Agree completely.
    The less you commute the more you can tolerate on an individual journey.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.