We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Are the Torys real Torys?
Comments
-
princeofpounds wrote: »Another interesting question, of course, is why businesses are permitted to write debt interest off their taxable income, whilst individuals are taxed on their revenue.
nonsense
even PAYE people can offset allowable expenses against their PAYE salary0 -
The Tories have had to raid business to get the deficit and benefits bill down without violating EU/un human rights - living wage is part of that
And raiding the poor will strangle the economy or cause a housing crashThis is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
When the council houses were sold off, the vast majority of the population would have described themselves as working class. I grew up on such a council estate and while a lot of the people were on relatively low incomes, it certainly wasn't a no-go area.
There's a reason people today need to rent from the private landlords you so despise. Because the social housing which was available previously was sold off at a massive discount to the previous generation. You might not like private landlords, but they are not the reason there's no alternative in the rental market.
You have misrepresented what I said. Firstly I ackowledged that BTL generates some benefits, such as work for lettings agents, but as I said they are massively outweighed by the downsides namely the cost to society especially the tax take. Secondly nowhere did I say that I despise private landlords. One of my friends has bought his second BTL. I say good luck to him, he is exploiting the current system. It is the system I dislike.
You hide behind the pretence that this is a typical business, as per a bakery, or a hire car company. I could not care less what you call this. It is in reality an investment scheme. If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and waddles, it's a duck. Why should I not be able to borrow to buy stocks and shares, and then offset the interest against tax? BTL is comparable, in fact it is worse. You ignored the huge cost to the taxpayer of a tenant retiring compared to a homeowner retiring, the loss of tax, and the fact that the private landlord destabilises the market, pushing up prices, creating a two tier society.
As for council estates, I've lived near enough to know to avoid. When young I was beaten up by council estate gangs. I've been attacked in a council estate as an adult. I've been harassed over the period of a year by children from a council estate.0 -
MatthewAinsworth wrote: »The Tories have had to raid business to get the deficit and benefits bill down without violating EU/un human rights - living wage is part of that
And raiding the poor will strangle the economy or cause a housing crash
They are making work pay, reducing tax on savings, increasing the personal allowance, seems pretty good to me. Unemployment has plummeted, I think the newly employed are benefitting.
Housing crash? Hohum.0 -
princeofpounds wrote: »Another interesting question, of course, is why businesses are permitted to write debt interest off their taxable income, whilst individuals are taxed on their revenue.
Or why a BTL landlord can claim tax relief from their personal income, but you cannot do the same for your own home mortgage.0 -
Banana republic - they are doing those things, as they do want do do what Tory things they can, but they couldn't abolish benefits completely even if they wanted to, because of the international outcry, and with that they had to raid business via the living wage, and raid buy toilet landlords
Raiding the poor would cause a housing crash - rents would not be paid, and with that rich people would suffer. If there was a housing collapse, banks would collapse tooThis is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
BananaRepublic wrote: »You have misrepresented what I said. Firstly I ackowledged that BTL generates some benefits, such as work for lettings agents, but as I said they are massively outweighed by the downsides namely the cost to society especially the tax take.
BTL directly generates tax receipts in the form of income tax and capital gains tax. Owner-occupation doesn’t. You STILL don’t understand this. There is no cost to the society from the tax take, as by definition, the tax receipts from BTL wouldn’t exist if BTL didn’t exist.
Secondly nowhere did I say that I despise private landlords. One of my friends has bought his second BTL. I say good luck to him, he is exploiting the current system. It is the system I dislike.
Hmmm, if think I’d entitled to infer a dislike of landlords when you say “stuff the pockets of private landlords” or "exploit the system".
You hide behind the pretence that this is a typical business, as per a bakery, or a hire car company. I could not care less what you call this.
I’m not hiding behind any pretence. I just have an understanding of the tax code.
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/pimmanual/pim1020.htm
It’s not a case of being a “typical” or “atypical” business. It’s just a case of businesses being taxed on profits and not turnover. Interest is a business expense.
It is in reality an investment scheme. If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and waddles, it's a duck. Why should I not be able to borrow to buy stocks and shares, and then offset the interest against tax?
Set up an investment holding company and you can (if you can find a willing bank). Or you could just purchased leveraged funds inside an ISA. Given most companies have debt on their balance sheet, you are to an extent doing this if you buy shares anyway.
BTL is comparable, in fact it is worse. You ignored the huge cost to the taxpayer of a tenant retiring compared to a homeowner retiring, the loss of tax, and the fact that the private landlord destabilises the market, pushing up prices, creating a two tier society.
I didn't ignore it. It was just a straw man. I don't disagree that this will become more of a problem with declining home ownership. It doesn't alter the nature of debt or interest though, which is what my post related to.
As for council estates, I've lived near enough to know to avoid. When young I was beaten up by council estate gangs. I've been attacked in a council estate as an adult. I've been harassed over the period of a year by children from a council estate.
Well, that's unfortunate, but it's an anecdote. Please don't judge all council estates or their residents by your experience."Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards