We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
offer accepted but condition for no reduction post survey
Comments
-
Scenario 1. House for sale for £550k. Looks in good condition. You offer £500k. Survey says the roof needs repairing and will cost £10k. You reduce your offer by £10k. Perfectly reasonable.
Scenario 2. House for sale for £550k. Looks like the roof needs replacing which would cost £10k. You, knowing this, offer £500k. Survey says the roof needs repairing and will cost £10k. You reduce your offer by £10k. Unreasonable - you already knew about this and factored it into your offer.
I suspect that this is why the vendor is saying no renegotiation.
Scenario 3 - House for sale for £550k. Looks like the roof needs replacing which would cost £10k. You, knowing this, offer £500k. Survey says the roof needs repairing and will cost £10k and there's a problem with a wall that will cost £10k. You knew about the roof but didn't know about the wall. You reduce your offer by £10k. Perfectly reasonable. If the vendor insists on "no renegotiation" that would be unreasonable as the survey had brought up something that you didn't know about.
You may want to list the things that you are aware of and tell the vendor that anything else that comes up on the survey is fair game to negotiate on.
Or you could ask them if there is anything that they think will come up on the survey that they don't want to negotiate on - and anything else not on his list is negotiable.0 -
It sounds like they're just saying that the house is obviously in need of full refurbishment and they're looking for an offer on that basis. They don't want to waste anybody's time renegotiating on the basis of specific details raised by the survey.
It's an unusual condition but it doesn't really do you any harm to agree to it, you can still withdraw your offer if the survey throws up anything that's really a deal breaker.0 -
Thanks for all the opinions
the house is not marketed as needing renovation and is neither priced that much lower
its just we would like to change the layout and modernise inc garden landscaping etc
the brochure or details dont say in need of any work rather say beautifully presented house
thats why could not understand the logic of the condition which cannot be enforced on either side
i have actually told estate agent today that we will not proceed with any preconditions0 -
thanks AdrianThe house is on the market as in need of major renovation.
You are placing your offer on it as in need of major renovation.
Seems only fair to say that's the basis on which the offer is being accepted, so there's no point in trying to then reduce further based on work being needed...
its not marketed as needing renovation
its marked as a beautifully presented house0 -
i have actually told estate agent today that we will not proceed with any preconditions
in my opinion that is rather foolish, if I was the vendor I would not change my stance so your choices are:
You walk away now, without a survey and you never know if there was work to do or not
You proceed, surveys fine
You proceed, surveys not good
What have you gained by stamping your foot and saying no preconditions.
Either get on with the survey or walk away!0 -
in my opinion that is rather foolish, if I was the vendor I would not change my stance so your choices are:
You walk away now, without a survey and you never know if there was work to do or not
You proceed, surveys fine
You proceed, surveys not good
What have you gained by stamping your foot and saying no preconditions.
Either get on with the survey or walk away!
I don't think it's foolish. It gives the vendor a chance to reconsider before he walks away. It's okay people saying they'd do the same in the vendor's shoes, but you have to acknowledge that this will be a big turn off to many vendors.
Perhaps the vendor can't afford to sell for less, but that's not reason for someone to buy into negative equity should something nasty and unexpected turn up. A full building survey on a £500K house isn't going to be cheap. I wouldn't want to spend on one knowing it's all or nothing. There's plenty more on the market in Leeds."Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius0 -
i started having cold feet ,thinking is there something we have missed about the house
never made the offer with renegotiation in mind but vendors stance has put me off
its not as if they have had multitude of offers
after long discussions today,we have decided to walk away if precondition stays though being new to this still cant understand logic of insisting on condition which is not enforcable0 -
The house is on the market as in need of major renovation.
You are placing your offer on it as in need of major renovation.
Seems only fair to say that's the basis on which the offer is being accepted, so there's no point in trying to then reduce further based on work being needed...
Unless the property isn't worth the offer price.0 -
In which case, you just walk away.Thrugelmir wrote: »Unless the property isn't worth the offer price.0 -
still cant understand logic of insisting on condition which is not enforcable
How is it not enforcable? I know its not in law, but they own the house and are making their position clear they won't go any lower. So in a way it is enforcable as you would either have to continue or walk away.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards