We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
MSE News: Autumn Statement 2015: Stamp duty hike on buy-to-let and second homes
Comments
-
-
alchemist.1 wrote: »There is a suggestion that you will have 18 months to reclaim the extra stamp duty paid if you sell your first home.
It will apply to all second homes purchased whatever the reason they are purchased for.
Seems logical. Particular where someone buys before selling.
Of course in the interim. The treasury has the benefit of the money.0 -
alchemist.1 wrote: »There is a suggestion that you will have 18 months to reclaim the extra stamp duty paid if you sell your first home.
It will apply to all second homes purchased whatever the reason they are purchased for.
So say you have a main home that you wish to sell and buy bigger, but also have an old flat owned from when one of the couple were single and now rented out, would you be clobbered for the extra 3%?I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0 -
So say you have a main home that you wish to sell and buy bigger, but also have an old flat owned from when one of the couple were single and now rented out, would you be clobbered for the extra 3%?
No you wouldn't but i don't think you get the eighteen month grace period to reclaim the additional SDT or yet to be agreed upon (if you don't sell your "old" main residence at the same time as buying "new" main residence house) .
Apologies, I've probably confused matters by referring to "first" and "second" homes when in reality should be main residence and additional property.
My info is based on this: http://paullewismoney.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/stamping-on-additional-homes.html
If you sell the the flat to buy another you will be clobbered with the additional 3%.0 -
so as I suspected you are guilty of tax evasion
property developing is classed as a trading activity subject to income tax not CGT
best that your side line ceases or you start taking professional advice before HMRC catches you out
Seriously what is your problem? You have no idea about anything I have done or my circumstances and no I have NEVER evaded tax.0 -
Just read Paul Lewis blog, and this whole second home is a complete mess, I think there will be loads of loopholes emerging, for those with a creative accounting procedurealchemist.1 wrote: »No you wouldn't but i don't think you get the eighteen month grace period to reclaim the additional SDT or yet to be agreed upon (if you don't sell your "old" main residence at the same time as buying "new" main residence house) .
Apologies, I've probably confused matters by referring to "first" and "second" homes when in reality should be main residence and additional property.
My info is based on this: http://paullewismoney.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/stamping-on-additional-homes.html
If you sell the the flat to buy another you will be clobbered with the additional 3%.
Cheers fj0 -
bigfreddiel wrote: »Just read Paul Lewis blog, and this whole second home is a complete mess, I think there will be loads of loopholes emerging, for those with a creative accounting procedure
Like any new tax change. The loopholes will get plugged over time.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »The loopholes will get plugged over time.
Or as is more often the case, they will be explored, exploited, enlarged, and ships sailed through them.I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.
Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.0 -
alchemist.1 wrote: »No you wouldn't but i don't think you get the eighteen month grace period to reclaim the additional SDT or yet to be agreed upon (if you don't sell your "old" main residence at the same time as buying "new" main residence house) .
Apologies, I've probably confused matters by referring to "first" and "second" homes when in reality should be main residence and additional property.
My info is based on this: http://paullewismoney.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/stamping-on-additional-homes.html
If you sell the the flat to buy another you will be clobbered with the additional 3%.
Yes, thanks. If Paul is correct at least landlords won't get penalised for moving home, which is sensible.0 -
my "problem" is that other people reading this thread will be misled by your use of certain words.Seriously what is your problem? You have no idea about anything I have done or my circumstances and no I have NEVER evaded tax.
if you were actually "developing" then you cannot be subject to the CGT limit as you state
if you were in fact merely owning and living in one house at a time, "doing it up", selling and then repeating it is possible you were entitled to private residence relief and therefore exempt CGT, in which case mention of the CGT threshold is irrelevant
however if you lived in one place whilst doing up a second place and believe you have the CGT threshold to play with you are wrong as that is property developing and is subject to income tax not CGTYes any profit I make over the CGT threshold is indeed declared thank you for your concern :-)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
