Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Boris to the rescue!

24

Comments

  • mwpt
    mwpt Posts: 2,502 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    ukcarper wrote: »
    Same old stereo typical bull poo.

    The coined word, NIMBY, exists for a reason. It' not a trait of baby boomers, it's a human trait. It just so happens that a larger proportion of boomers own property and so the NIMBY tag gets applied.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    mwpt wrote: »
    The coined word, NIMBY, exists for a reason. It' not a trait of baby boomers, it's a human trait. It just so happens that a larger proportion of boomers own property and so the NIMBY tag gets applied.
    A larger proportion of boomers own than other generations but overall they are not the majority. I'd say boomers are no more anti development than any other age group.
  • I have no problem with crediting the boomer generation for the advances they made.


    I also have no problem castigating them for sucking the wealth from other generations.


    They are not mutually exclusive.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I have no problem with crediting the boomer generation for the advances they made.


    I also have no problem castigating them for sucking the wealth from other generations.


    They are not mutually exclusive.
    I hear this all the time perhaps you could explain exactly how boomers are sucking the wealth from other generations.
  • mwpt
    mwpt Posts: 2,502 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    ukcarper wrote: »
    A larger proportion of boomers own than other generations but overall they are not the majority. I'd say boomers are no more anti development than any other age group.

    Did you actually read my post?
  • chris_m
    chris_m Posts: 8,250 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    ukcarper wrote: »
    I hear this all the time perhaps you could explain exactly how boomers are sucking the wealth from other generations.

    Well, Trident subs are rather expensive :p

    (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boomer#In_the_military)
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    mwpt wrote: »
    Did you actually read my post?
    You didn't qualify your post.
  • PasturesNew
    PasturesNew Posts: 70,698 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Whatever you say about boomers: Those are your parents/grandparents you're whining about.

    You can't get closer to home than a boomer.... you've all got/had them.

    So, phone up your mum/dad/granny now and whine down the phone at them.
  • done - they agreed with me completely
    Left is never right but I always am.
  • I hear this all the time perhaps you could explain exactly how boomers are sucking the wealth from other generations.


    I was being dramatic, largely for effect.


    I appreciate that there is a web of complex problems. I also think there is little intentional agency on the part of the boomer generation, although they have benefitted from a number of important policies which act to the detriment of other ages.


    Two areas are of particular interest to me.


    One is housing, where supply is being restricted through an over-tight planning system. This (along with low interest rates) has boosted house prices and rents, to the detriment of those citizens who do not hold real estate capital (notably the young).


    It's not just about money; it's also about the ability to live in secure accommodation and have decent living conditions.


    The other is sovereign debt in all its forms. Not just the obvious government borrowing, but also the implicit liabilities for things like unfunded pensions (which are even longer in maturity and hugely significant).


    Debt is simply consumption brought forward in time, effectively leaving later workers to pick up the bill for earlier workers.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.