We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Urgent - Landlord holding work tools hostage
Comments
-
95% of Law police do is Civil law and civil matters.
Its never a civil matter when its a big company.
Only Joe public.I do Contracts, all day every day.0 -
Marktheshark wrote: »95% of Law police do is Civil law and civil matters.
Its never a civil matter when its a big company.
Only Joe public.
Since when have sexual offences, road traffic act, assaults and damage ever been civil law? Or maybe we'll shocked when you evidence your claim.0 -
I was being quite sincere.
If you say the law states what I described as not illegal, then you can surely show me?
I believe the action amounts to causing continual alarm and distress.
Is the landlords conduct still on going? And before answer ignore the fact he has retained the tools.0 -
I feel for members that come on these forums asking a perfectly reasonable question get given advice and then someone else pipes on up contradicting without providing the proof. Why contridict people if your not prepared to prove, and why do it in a rude , combative manner?0
-
Selling the tools would deprive him permanently, which then becomes theft.
This alleged debt, does not allow the goods to be sold.
The protection from harassment act may also be applicable
The issue is not one of an intention to permanently deprive but one of dishonesty.
If the landlord believes he has a right to sell the tenant's tools to recoup money to pay for damage to the property then he is not acting dishonestly. Dishonesty is an essential ingredient of theft.
The landlord clearly intends to permanently deprive the tenant by selling his tools. That is not up for debate.What will your verse be?
R.I.P Robin Williams.0 -
The issue is not one of an intention to permanently deprive but one of dishonesty.
If the landlord believes he has a right to sell the tenant's tools to recoup money to pay for damage to the property then he is not acting dishonestly. Dishonesty is an essential ingredient of theft.
The landlord clearly intends to permanently deprive the tenant by selling his tools. That is not up for debate.
I think other members will disagree with you on that point. If the other members are reasonable and honest and think the landlord has acted dishonestly then he'd be convicted of theft if it came down to it. R v Ghosh says so.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.7K Spending & Discounts
- 247.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.7K Life & Family
- 262.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards