We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Big rise in private medical insurance work scheme

Hello,

Are there usually safeguards to prevent major increases to the cost of private medical insurance work schemes in the case of high deductions?

I am curious if this is normal, just part of life, or if my company hasn't negotiated well.

I have been a member of my employer's scheme for 12 years. Until this year, increases to the cost had never been above 10%. In some years, when we changed insurance company the rate even went down but on average it was 5% a year, just under £400 a year when I joined 12 years ago to about £650 until this year.

We have been involved the rate will be increasing to 1100, almost double "because we have had high expenses". I know this to be mostly related to a very expensive cancer therapy of an employee's spouse. It is these type of scenarios why I and colleagues sign up but there is a sense of "unfairness" at how this cost is being spread but it is understandably a touchy subject as such it hasn't been raised officially as people are concerned it would seem insensitive.

Is it normal for these group policies to work like this, where every individual pays the same even if for example they haven't ever made a claim? And when there is a big expense (million pound therapy) a huge rise to everybody's rates?

Cheers, Andy

Comments

  • Quentin
    Quentin Posts: 40,405 Forumite
    See how much you would have to pay were you to drop out of the work scheme and join up directly for similar cover, do the sums and make the choice.
  • Kynthia
    Kynthia Posts: 5,692 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I know in one situation where the employer paid for the medical cover as a perk. It became much cheaper for them to remove the spouse from the group work policy and reimburse the employee for the cost of that individual's cover. Could something similar be proposed here?
    Don't listen to me, I'm no expert!
  • Quentin, I can of course leave the scheme and do my own thing, I was instead interested to know if this is normal or if my employer cocked up with the contract terms, etc.

    Kynthia, so basically kick out the spouse and give a refund? I can't see that happening.
  • jaybeetoo
    jaybeetoo Posts: 1,396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    expansion wrote: »
    Are there usually safeguards to prevent major increases to the cost of private medical insurance work schemes in the case of high deductions?

    No
    Is it normal for these group policies to work like this, where every individual pays the same even if for example they haven't ever made a claim? And when there is a big expense (million pound therapy) a huge rise to everybody's rates?

    Yes - that is the point of a group scheme as opposed to individual cover. The old pay the same as the young, the sick the same as the healthy.

    Insurers look at the claim history of the group when setting premiums.
  • Kynthia
    Kynthia Posts: 5,692 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    expansion wrote: »
    Quentin, I can of course leave the scheme and do my own thing, I was instead interested to know if this is normal or if my employer cocked up with the contract terms, etc.

    Kynthia, so basically kick out the spouse and give a refund? I can't see that happening.

    No, fund them separately.
    Don't listen to me, I'm no expert!
  • That is an idea. I will suggest this to a colleague who is more privy to our HR.
  • jaybeetoo wrote: »
    No



    Yes - that is the point of a group scheme as opposed to individual cover. The old pay the same as the young, the sick the same as the healthy.

    Insurers look at the claim history of the group when setting premiums.

    This is incorrect information - the old do not pay the same as the young. Group schemes consist of age brackets and not sure why you (jaybeetoo) would make up information on this...?
  • Fairly certain we all get the same email with the same figures, I will check the email on my work computer, but I'm fairly certain my work scheme doesn't have age brackets and all employees pay the same (partners, children are extra of course)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.