We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
CGT on holiday home
Options

Snowdrop1
Posts: 6 Forumite
in Cutting tax
My parents have owned a holiday home since 1981. As they are both in their 80's now they are considering whether to let it out as a holiday let or to sell the property. They bought the property for £20,000 and it has been valued at £200,000. They are low rate tax payers, and is jointly owned by both of them. Advise please on how I work this out. Many thanks.
0
Comments
-
CGT starts at 31 March 1982 therefore the value of £20k may, or may not, be acceptable for use in the calculation as technically you must use the value at exactly that date for items that existed before then. HMRC will use that date and so it might be wise for you to also do so- you can ask HMRC to check the value you use on Form CG 34 .
For the sake of an example let us stick with 20k
the gain is 180,000, joint owned so 90,000 each. They can deduct the costs of legal fees and EA fees upon its purchase (if they have any paperwork to support them!) and its sale
it has never been their main home at any time during their ownership so the only relief they get is their personal allowance. Let us say the legal fees and EA fees are 5,000, so:
father: 90,000 - 11,100 -2,500 = 76,300 taxable gain
mother: 90,000 - 11,100 - 2,500 = 76,300 taxable gain
given the size of the gain each will be required to do a self assessment tax return to report their liability and pay the tax due
the amount payable depends on how much income they have. For example let us say father has taxable income (pensions and savings interest) of 20,000 per year. His CGT will be:
42,385 - 20,000 = 22,385 taxable at 18% = 4,029
76,300 - 22,385 = 53,915 taxable at 28% = 15,096
so in that example he would pay £19,125 CGT out of his 90,000 share and your mother would pay whatever the figures are based on her taxable income. Remember each is taxed individually, they cannot declare one combined gain0 -
CGT starts at 31 March 1982 therefore the value of £20k may, or may not, be acceptable for use in the calculation as technically you must use the value at exactly that date for items that existed before then. HMRC will use that date and so it might be wise for you to also do so- you can ask HMRC to check the value you use on Form CG 34 .
For the sake of an example let us stick with 20k
the gain is 180,000, joint owned so 90,000 each. They can deduct the costs of legal fees and EA fees upon its purchase (if they have any paperwork to support them!) and its sale
it has never been their main home at any time during their ownership so the only relief they get is their personal allowance. Let us say the legal fees and EA fees are 5,000, so:
father: 90,000 - 11,100 -2,500 = 76,300 taxable gain
mother: 90,000 - 11,100 - 2,500 = 76,300 taxable gain
given the size of the gain each will be required to do a self assessment tax return to report their liability and pay the tax due
the amount payable depends on how much income they have. For example let us say father has taxable income (pensions and savings interest) of 20,000 per year. His CGT will be:
42,385 - 20,000 = 22,385 taxable at 18% = 4,029
76,300 - 22,385 = 53,915 taxable at 18% = 15,096
so in that example he would pay £19,125 CGT out of his 90,000 share and your mother would pay whatever the figures are based on her taxable income. Remember each is taxed individually, they cannot declare one combined gain
you have a little typo: you have written 18% twice rather than 28% for the second time
regards0 -
That's really helpful, thank you. My mum only has a state pension and No savings so guessing her tax bill would be less?0
-
do they need the money?
I ask because if you were the beneficiary of their will, then maybe (and maybe not) it might be better to let it out and then inherit in due course
but this critically depends upon their whole financial situation0 -
They don't need the money at the moment, my mum has advanced Alzheimer's, and dad is her carer, the cottage 350 miles away, which has meant its been empty for a year. Yes I would inheriate solely. It's whether having it as a holiday let would add extra stress to my dad, as there are only the two of us and my mum, and we are not sure how much work would be involved particularly as it is so far away. But then again, it's a shame to pay all that tax.0
-
Who has the LPA. The question here is what is in their best interest; not yours. It sounds as if it will be in their best interest to sell and realise cash to pay for care; or take a reverse mortgage and realise cash. But...if they have cash they might become self-funding for care. This needs specialist advice to ensure that the attorney acts in their best interest.0
-
That's really helpful, thank you. My mum only has a state pension and No savings so guessing her tax bill would be less?
as for "its a lot of tax" never base decision on the tax tail wagging the dog. Your mother's attorney must act in her best interest, which may not involve paying the least tax or leaving you with an inheritance given her circumstances0 -
Another factor to consider is that any years for which the property is a qualifying FHL will attract a 10% CGT rate on the eventual disposal. Being a remote FHL owner need not be a barrier to decent profits depending on the location, though clearly paying a managing agent will reduce profit margins.
I have around 20 clients with FHLs here in the Lake District, the better ones make very good returns so there is scope to pay for an agent to manage it and still be OK providing it is a high-end property kitted out to a high specification.Hideous Muddles from Right Charlies0 -
thanks for all the information, I will relay it to my dad. Myself and my dad have POA for my mum. She does have rest bite care and carers visit during the week, which my dad pays towards already. Ultimately I think my dad has to decide if he wants to keep the property, and if so how he would feel about renting it out, lots to factor in. Very helpful understanding the CGT situation. Many thanks0
-
the cottage 350 miles away, which has meant its been empty for a year. Yes I would inheriate solely. It's whether having it as a holiday let would add extra stress to my dad, as there are only the two of us and my mum, and we are not sure how much work would be involved particularly as it is so far away. But then again, it's a shame to pay all that tax.
As an aside, who (if anyone) is visiting and monitoring the property now ? Are you comfortable that it's correctly insured and that you are meeting all the requirements for that insurance ?
We have a holiday home and have buildings and contents inusrance specifically for a holiday home, but as one of the conditions they insist that we visit the propery at least once a month. There are also a number of other conditions such as maintaining a minimum temperature ....0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards