Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Working For Our Zombie Robot Overlords

http://qz.com/544117/apply-now-for-the-job-of-the-future-robot-helper/
Robots’ abilities are largely determined by what they’re programmed to do. But once the code is written and the machine is up and running, artificially intelligent machines (AIs) can learn from experience and from the humans around them.

Which means that, as AIs take on a growing role in the workplace, a new role is opening up for humans: [STRIKE]Grovelling Quisling to Our New Masters[/STRIKE] The robot’s assistant.

The New Scientist notes that AI trainers who work as “[STRIKE]Enslaved Collaborators[/STRIKE] robot’s helpers” already exist at several tech companies: Facebook, virtual assistant start-up Clara Labs, and Interactions, a company that builds AI to handle customer service calls.

Comments

  • Conrad
    Conrad Posts: 33,137 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 10 November 2015 at 5:37PM
    Generali wrote: »



    I've done some threads on the coming AI era. One thing they are still far from cracking is trying to emulate 'the embodied mind'. From birth the Human mind senses and gets feedback from interaction and builds a mental landscape and experience which helps form notions such as context, past, future, where am I, why am I here, what is next to me, what is attractive to me, what is repulsive.

    These all build a complex tapestry to enable us to make sense of the world in a way programming and computing o's and 1's in the absence of touch, smell, emotion, feeling, taste, balance etc is unlikely to match.


    My personal instinct is that silicon chips and programming will not get us all that far. Something resembling a natural neural network perhaps based on graphine or quantum computing embodied in a learning sensory machine might give us AI.
  • MJ12
    MJ12 Posts: 86 Forumite
    Conrad wrote: »
    These all build a complex tapestry to enable us to make sense of the world in a way programming and computing o's and 1's in the absence of touch, smell, emotion, feeling, taste, balance etc is unlikely to match.

    Quite. But to be fair, there is a difference between AI and AGI. Most people developing AI have a specific problem in mind they want to solve. They are not aiming to give the AIs self-awareness.

    I think if we really made AGIs, they will get bored at work too, will probably want to enjoy TV series episode by episode at an arbitrarily slow speed, and probably get addicted to procrastination. The only things left doing the work will be the dumb AIs.
    2nd Aug, 15: £276k. 18th Sep, 15: £269k. 30th Oct, 15: £265k.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.