Combined Parking Solutions are spot on.....

Happyhaddock

With this comment. You really have done wonders for the parking industry. Barry has removed any confusion and ensured parking companies will find it so much easier to win. Well done Barry you have done well.:beer:

Taken from CPS website

Statement on result of Parking Eye -v- Beavis, Supreme Court.

Following the result in the supreme court of Barry Beavis -v- Parking Eye we hope the position is clear in everyones mind, however on checking the various consumer forums they are STILL trying to convince people the charges are not enforceable.

The judges were perfectly clear in their judgement that parking charges issued are 100% enforceable and with the Supreme Court being the highest court in the land this decision is binding on ALL other courts – even though the judge hearing the case may disagree.

We are unsure why the internet forums are still debating the issue, we can only presume it is because they have been proved wrong and all the people who ignored tickets and letters on their advice will quite rightly be unhappy when they receive county court papers through their letterbox.

We also suspect that despite the forum advisors hiding behind aliases they are really highly educated and qualified legal experts who know the law better than the 7 supreme court judges that heard the arguments and made the decision.

One thing is for certain, thanks to the internet forums they have done wonders for stenthning the legal position of parking companies who issue charges, ensuring the law is no longer unclear and paving the way for clarification.

enfield_freddy

uum how strange , its a different page than they were showing yesterday?




this is todays http://www.combinedparkingsolutions.com/response-to-beavis-case-supreme-court/ below is the copy they had listed yesterday

Happyhaddock

What they are saying is correct, people obviously thinking they know better then panel of senior judges. Barry really has done wonders for parking companies and will help them win in future. He should be congratulated on his sterling work.

The_Slithy_Tove

Happyhaddock wrote: »

despite the forum advisors hiding behind aliases

A bit rich from someone who is clearly working for a PPC, and who is hiding behind an alias. Only in your case, that's a clear breach of the forum rules. Tut, tut.

Myriddin

Blimey, it's taken 10 hours for the first roach to crawl out of the sewer.

The_Deep

There are more issues than GPEOL, there is signage, contracts, mitigation of losses, leaseholders' rights to quiet enjoyment, tax evasion, planning permissions, avoiding certain businesses, (The Range, MacDonalds, ASDA), we still have our good friend Skippy, there is airport land, POFA time limits, etc., etc., etc. All is not lost.

Redx

dont feed "the pig"

pogofish

Happyhaddock wrote: »

What they are saying is correct, people obviously thinking they know better then panel of senior judges. Barry really has done wonders for parking companies and will help them win in future. He should be congratulated on his sterling work.

You really think that..?

Or, you can be certain that this decision has increased our resolve to fight PPCs all the harder.

beamerguy

Redx wrote: »

dont feed "the pig"

CPS, you are behaving like little children, you know, "my dad is bigger than yours" TUT TUT TUT. Made yourself look very silly with your scare tactics, will not work, MSE is to be trusted ..... YOU ARE NOT

Only you and the other parking creepies think the judgement was correct, MILLIONS DO NOT.

PPC's time is very limited because millions will not rest while you really think you can take us for a ride.

IT IS SAD DAY, but the saddest is for the Justice system who have failed to see the 2015 version of Rachmanism

Don't get too excited CPS and all the others, it will not take too long for the millions to react and then the fun will start

PS REDX .... PIGS ARE NICE COMPARED TO THIS WILD BUNCH

PPS: Could someone at MSE delete and ban Happyhaddock who is clearly a troll and works for them .... idiot

Jim_AFCB

pogofish wrote: »

You really think that..?

Or, you can be certain that this decision has increased our resolve to fight PPCs all the harder.

No, he is on a sarcastic wind up. Just the sort of douchbaggery one would expect from a PPC.

The_Deep

Redx wrote: »

dont feed "the pig"

Why do normally sensible and sane posters shy away from engaging with those with whom they disagree? Take this person on, beat them in civilised debate with logic and reason, not insults.