We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Potential Lying on Property Information Form
Comments
-
The noise may have stopped completely, then when your vendors moved out the neighbours thought, "sod it those moany old neighbours have gone now" and let the dogs crack on as before as they've got new neighbours who might just put up with it.0
-
Hello, looking for a bit of advice.
Background - Bought house in August 2014, it was mentioned on Property Information Form that there was a noise dispute with the neighbours (dogs) that involved the council but since abated and "noise no longer an issue".
We have since spent a year attempting to put up with the noise and have just reported them ourselves. The noisy neighbours must have made an impact as the councils Environmental Officer remembered them! Since then other neighbours have let us know that this was the reason they left the property, obviously meaning their statement of "noise no longer an issue" isn't true.
What can we do about this? Is there any recourse we can take? Had we known that the noise was still an issue we wouldn't have purchased the property.
Many Thanks
What recourse do you expect/want? You bought the house more than a year ago so can hardly go back to the sellers and demand some compensation now.Its not that we have more patience as we grow older, its just that we're too tired to care about all the pointless drama
0 -
-
Presumably they've tried to sort things out themselves, first, in a neighbourly way.Thrugelmir wrote: »Why now have you only formally reported the issue? Rather late to blame the previous owners.
Plus, of course, that if they don't formally report it then they wouldn't have to declare the issue when they come to sell
0 -
Why did you proceed with the purchase, knowing of the potential problem? You could have then made your own further enquiries.No free lunch, and no free laptop
0 -
-
JimmyTheWig wrote: »It sounds like they proceeded on the basis of believing that "noise no longer an issue" meant that the problem had been resolved.
I would have interpreted it as meaning "Oh those neighbours cant have the dog any longer or have moved" - hence problem solved. Its clear that is exactly how the vendor wanted prospective buyers to interpret it - so that they could turn round and go "Oh well if that's how you chose to interpret that sentence...your fault". All the time, of course, they would know very well the vast majority of would-be buyers would interpret it that way...
Looking at the words used in hindsight here "noise no longer an issue" does seem to be a case of weasel words having been used - as a lot of different interpretations could be put on that (eg even down to the last house owners having gone deaf - so the barking was still happening but they no longer heard it personally).0 -
JimmyTheWig wrote: »Presumably they've tried to sort things out themselves, first, in a neighbourly way.
Over 12 months is a long time.0 -
moneyistooshorttomention wrote: »I would have interpreted it as meaning "Oh those neighbours cant have the dog any longer or have moved" - hence problem solved. Its clear that is exactly how the vendor wanted prospective buyers to interpret it - so that they could turn round and go "Oh well if that's how you chose to interpret that sentence...your fault". All the time, of course, they would know very well the vast majority of would-be buyers would interpret it that way...
I would have gone and spoken to neighbours. Knocking on the door of the one with the dog first, I certainly wouldn't just assume they don't have a dog or have moved. If any dispute or problem is mentioned go and do some digging - of course the vendor is going to be ambiguous, they are never going to tell you the full extent of the problem that is driving them and any reasonable person out!0 -
Maybe the problem with the barking was resolved but the vendor felt after most probably many discussions etc with the dog owner that they weren't able to comfortably remain living there? The dog owners are obviously the problem so maybe they thought they could go back to their old ways once the neighbours had left.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
