We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

FCA 6 month deadline

Stupidly, I have left it longer than 6 months to forward my complaint to the FCA after the banks rejected my PPI complaint.

I had a number of reasons but they have been dismissed as excuses - even though they involved moving jobs, moving house, getting married and a serious family illness.

The FCA have refused to review the complaint as the banks have told them no. Seems very biased towards the banks.

Is there a way around this that anyone has come up with?

Thanks for any advice/guidance.

Comments

  • rizla_king
    rizla_king Posts: 2,895 Forumite
    Hilloquis wrote: »
    Is there a way around this that anyone has come up with?

    sadly no. yours were not exceptional circumstances under

    http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/six-month-time-limit.htmml
    Still rolling rolling rolling...... :) <
    SIGNATURE - Not part of post
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,213 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    You mean FOS. Not FCA.
    The FCA have refused to review the complaint as the banks have told them no. Seems very biased towards the banks.

    The FOS have no such bias. Similar timebarring exists elsewhere in all walks of life.
    Is there a way around this that anyone has come up with?

    No. You would need to recreate incapacity or death of direct family member in that period to typically be accepted. It doesnt just cover the 6 months either. it is the whole period since the complaint was rejected. So, if your rejection was 18 months ago, then you have to be incapacitated for that 18 month period. Not just the first 6 months.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • dunstonh wrote: »
    The FOS have no such bias. Similar timebarring exists elsewhere in all walks of life.
    Actually, the bias is in the other direction.

    In any other area, a business would be entitled to apply the 15 year limit in Section 14B of the Limitation Act 1980. FOS and the FCA choose to ignore it.

    A serious family illness MIGHT enable you to successfully argue that there were exceptional circumstances. However, that is not guaranteed.

    They would need to be close family, such as a child or an adult for whom you were the next of kin of a primary carer.

    To give an idea of what I mean, a couple of years ago, a complaint I dealt with was successfully timebarred because although the complainant claimed to be too ill to complain in time AND that was also too busy caring for a sick relative, Google led me to a website showing them involved in activities with the Scout Association. Laudable as that may be, it is a spare time activity - so they clearly had some time to spare.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.