We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

PPI claim and evidencing sufficient cover elsewhere

Hi, my bank when asked last year told me they do not hold records over 7 years so can not tell me if i had a loan with PPI.

I knew i did but had no records from 1997 when the loan was taken out but knew I had sufficient cover (work paid sick pay and redundancy).

I made a claim recently using the online process and sure enough they have agreed i had a loan (they tell me it was takn out on 11th Aug 1997) and now following the online application and a follow up call want me to 'provide further info' about this employment, i have moved on and the company have been absorbed into a larger company.

Question what can i do to satisfy the bank i was employed, i did have the cover i said?

Also they are asking 'to provide further information' how i was sold the policy and why do i think it was mis sold...... honest answer is i cant remember but i did know if explained properly i would have told them i did not need it.

Advice please? :cool:

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,215 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Question what can i do to satisfy the bank i was employed, i did have the cover i said?

    statements showing your salary being paid or copy payslips or P60s or copy tax returns or just ask your employer to verify it.

    Lenders can ask for proof if they find no other failing in your complaint and you have listed employer benefits as a reason. Many lenders hold records of various employers so know the benefits they offered. However, with smaller companies, that may not be the case and most people tend to overstate their benefits. So, evidence is often asked.
    Also they are asking 'to provide further information' how i was sold the policy and why do i think it was mis sold...... honest answer is i cant remember but i did know if explained properly i would have told them i did not need it.

    Again, this suggests that they have not found any failure yet and are asking for information. Whilst recollections would be expected to be poor and they don't actually count for much (as allegations of wrongdoing there cannot normally be proven), sometimes someone may recall something that can help them find an issue. If you dont remember then say you dont remember. Do not lie or guess as that can work against you.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • It is not simply knowing you were employed. You would need to prove contractual sick pay.

    You also need to prove a contractual entitlement to redundancy pay. I have never come across anything more than an expression of intent - which would go out of the window if the employer went bust and therefore is not guaranteed.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.