Parking Eye's Delaying Tactics.

14wrence

Half_way wrote: »

As above full force should be put on the principal (Wynsors) especially if they know that there as an EA act element to this.
They contracted parking eye and allowed the parasitic parking company onto their car park to act on their behalf.
The antics of Paking Eye, Rachel Ledson, Rosana Breaks and co are well known, and it could possibly be argued that Wynsors have been negligent in allowing this parasitic and predatory company onto their car park.

When contacting Wynsors ( if it is them , if not then the landowner/whoever allowed this company onto their land) you will need to knock the nothing to do with us we contract our parking out to parking eye, you need to contact parking eye Type of response out of them, Tell them that they are jointly liable for the actions of their agents.

If going to the press make sure that the message gets out that Wynsor Shoes ( or who ever) are pursuing you/the driver/the person involved through their agents parkting eye, and also make it known that Wynsor shoes ( or who ever) are responsible for their agents actions

I am going to write one more letter to appeal to their good nature, then I will go to the local press. I know a girl who used to work as a reporter for the local press, so I will ask her for a contact..

ampersand

Still working on it, op - just in case you haven't read my replies to both your pms.
#
'Archers' just ended on r4. pm sent, draft>you. Out now.

14wrence

I have sent the above appeal to POPLA today... I hope it is not to late, as I said the ex partner has been really bad sharing letters and dates with my Colleague..

ampersand

14wrence - as per latest pm, you need to be sending that other em to the person I've spoken with, too. Hope you've done this. Best wishes to your colleague+daughter.

14wrence

OK - It seems the date has ran out.

This should have been in by 30th November - I blame myself, as I feel I have now cost my colleague by sitting on this. However she did not get the POPLA code off her ex partner, until the 10th November who had said it had come that day.

Either her ex partner had sat on it for a week - or Parking eye sent the letter a week after the code was generated.

This I do not know, although I thought we had until tomorrow.

Is this Game over now - or is there still any grounds to appeal - i.e small claims court???

I am going to send the appeal into POLA via their email address if it still works though, just to try.

14wrence

ampersand wrote: »

14wrence - as per latest pm, you need to be sending that other em to the person I've spoken with, too. Hope you've done this. Best wishes to your colleague+daughter.

Yes that has been sent - many thanks Ampersand

ampersand

That's not an answer to the above, op.
Do what was detailed by pm on 3 Dec, please.

It runs with what half-way also emphasised in #30:

As above full force should be put on the principal (Wynsors) especially if they know that there as an EA act element to this.
They contracted parking eye and allowed the parasitic parking company onto their car park to act on their behalf.
'Tell them that they are jointly liable for the actions of their agents..
#
op - I am sorry but lack of attention to vital detail is worsening matters, not helped by deliberate inaction/obstruction from friend's ex. We understand this, but look here:
#20
I have been informed that we have until early December to get the appeal in.
[who informed you? Was a date set down somewhere, or was it miscalculation, perhaps counting working days rather than actual days?]

However it occurred, it is not in line with #28, posted 4 Dec, 'I am hoping that letter is ok to go tomorrow, as have to send it by then.'

That's inadequately defined, op - i.e. receipt by x, or proof of sending by x? - and I would not call anything beyond Day 3 early for business purposes.

re: 'This should have been in by 30th November - I blame myself, as I feel I have now cost my colleague by sitting on this. However she did not get the POPLA code off her ex partner, until the 10th November who had said it had come that day' - there were still 20 days to work on this and you were around for 10 of them.
Sometimes we all, including colleague, just have to take that 1st step to master difficult opponents, if only by insistently speaking to Wynsors' HO.
Their fobbing responses do them no credit but you have a path to possibly amend this.
#
I'm unclear where you are now with everything.
Regardless of all else, please follow my pm advice from 3 Dec onwards. If you don't, it falls ill on the person who undertook to deal with matters directly[and my bonafides doing same for others, unimportant though that is.]

A short covering para. can cite 'difficulties with online submission, hence this hard copy, for which I would appreciate your early acknowledgment.'

As c-m, queen of these Threads, emphasised in her 1st sentence, #23, this determining diagnosis of epilepsy is not one to be dismissed as 'mitigation', therefore disqualified from inclusion.

BUT FIRST, PLEASE DISCUSS IT WITH THAT CONTACT ESTABLISHED LAST WEEK!!!
Remember how the local press want to know as well? :-))).

op - you are trying your best for your friend/colleague and no-one will blame you if playing with words/legalese/shysters/parking scumpanies is not your natural territory. But good intentions are not enough.

You say you've sent a popla appeal to OS Ltd. Do you mean unaltered from #25?
Hope not, without final critique from here.
#
re:
Is this Game over now - or is there still any grounds to appeal - i.e small claims court???
op - colleague hasn't received anything from Court yet.
She must also organise mail re-direction, despite cost
https://www.royalmail.com/personal/receiving-mail/redirection
Within the UK*
Up to 3 months £29.99
[Appts will be coming for daughter too, won't they?]
You're jumping the gun re LBCCC because you feel you've let her down.
IF, big 'IF', genuine Court papers are threatened or issued, come straight back here.
#
Finally,
I am going to send the appeal into OS LTD via their email address if it still works though, just to try.
^^^re the above, this is an excellent time to send correspeondence by post, obtaining and retaining a free Cert., of Posting at the PO counter.
This is the address to use for a suitably critiqued popla appeal:
http://popla.co.uk/help-with-your-appeal

'If you need to submit an appeal in writing you can send your completed application form to
POPLA
PO Box 1270
WARRINGTON
WA4 9RL'
Never send anything RD[it can be refused], just 1st class stamped with that Cert. of Posting. Courts deem any such letter as delivered within 48hrs.

Please excuse any hardline tone, kindly meant:-) Just need some clarity, as do you. Wynsors was always the first way forward though, AND REPEATEDLY.

14wrence

ok so I sent 2 appeals to Popla, one by post and one by email.

I have complained to the BPA too, as - as far as we are aware - providing the truth is being told by her ex, he got the Popla code on the 10th November and not the 30th October which they have said the Popla code was produced on. Therefore we received the Popla code very late and have not actually had a full 28 days.

Most importantly - and big big thanks to Ampersand....

We received a reply from Windsors MD yesterday, who has not said anything of note just yet, only that he is looking into it and will let us know when he has done.

My colleague has plenty of evidence to show the ongoing visits to the NHS going back 12 month or more, they are still having medical appointments to date, so if evidence should ever be needed, I am sure it can be obtained.

ampersand

'I have complained to the BPA too, as - as far as we are aware - providing the truth is being told by her ex, he got the Popla code on the 10th November and not the 30th October'
#
Well done for getting that in, as well as both forms of appeal.
Do note that spelling of 'WYNSORS' though - it's an odd one.

Keep us updated. Hope all goes well with consultant today.

14wrence

Ampersand thanks so much you are a saint.

We had an email off the BPA today, who said that Parking Eye have told them the charge has been cancelled.

I presume this is due to Wynsors doing the right thing for us and telling them to cancel it - so thanks for all your help.


My colleague is relieved - a nice present before Christmas.....