We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!

Valuing chattels

2»

Comments

  • anandp
    anandp Posts: 279 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    phill99 wrote: »
    But you have hit the nail on the head: 'the right person'. That person who wants THAT colour, THAT style and has THAT window size is an exceedingly rare thing. It therefore becomes a buyers market and they will dictate the price.

    So if I'm the 'right' person, and I'm the buyer of the property too, a higher price (not unreasonable) on the chattels is acceptable?
    Interested in property investment, web tech, social media, forex, equities. Also a proud father & entrepreneur of sorts.
  • kinger101
    kinger101 Posts: 6,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    anandp wrote: »
    As an example, for one of the bay windows, the original curtains cost £800 on their own. So even if you account for second-hand on these, they should surely be worth £300 at least if another window were to take them?

    If I ever have a yard sale, I'm going to send you an invite. I'd say a fair value for 8 yo curtains is nil. Be honest, if the vendor offered you these curtains for £300 on the fixtures and fittings form, would you really buy them?

    Personally, on properties under £250K, I can't see the point on apportioning anything unless you have an item that is demonstrably worth over £1000. At 2%, it's not worth the faff.

    If you do SA returns, you definitely want to stay off HMRC's radar.
    "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius
  • phill99
    phill99 Posts: 9,093 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    anandp wrote: »
    So if I'm the 'right' person, and I'm the buyer of the property too, a higher price (not unreasonable) on the chattels is acceptable?

    You can get whatever someone is willing to pay for them. 99% of buyers will redecorate any way and your curtains are very unlikely to match and they will get rid of them. As I said earlier, you will be lucky to get £50 for them.
    Eat vegetables and fear no creditors, rather than eat duck and hide.
  • booksurr
    booksurr Posts: 3,700 Forumite
    anandp wrote: »
    So if I'm the 'right' person, and I'm the buyer of the property too, a higher price (not unreasonable) on the chattels is acceptable?
    acceptable to the vendor - doubtless

    acceptable to HMRC when it comes to deciding if you are avoiding SDLT by inflating the chattels figure - it depends!

    acceptable to your lender because they may regard it as you manipulating the LTV ratio - it depends!
  • DigForVictory
    DigForVictory Posts: 12,145 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The old house had really odd interior doors - think wrought iron bubbles, some purple, some green, mostly clear, trapped in layers of perspex. Plus the bathroom clean but as as we found it, "period 60s" as the surveyor kindly described it.
    We had one couple put a bid in for the doors alone. Whereas a lot of viewing folk shuddered & tried to gouge new interior doors off the price.
    Nowt as odd as taste. However, aim low and you're unlikely to be disappointed.

    Months later (update your Amazon delivery address as well as utilities etc when moving?!), we found the couple so smitten with the doors had bought the place next door (a little smaller) and recovered the doors from the skip as our buyer renovated to 'modern taste'.
  • mrginge
    mrginge Posts: 4,843 Forumite
    anandp wrote: »
    So if I'm the 'right' person, and I'm the buyer of the property too, a higher price (not unreasonable) on the chattels is acceptable?

    There is no relevance in who is buying the goods, so you cannot add a premium on. The question is what is the fair value, not what is the fair value to anandp.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.