📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

I have a PPI Policy taken out

Options
With GE Money Home Lending taken out in 2004 that was paid off in 2005 it was part of a secured loan the Optional Protection policy as it was called was around £3000 andpaid as a single premium,i have policy number/policy provider but GE Home Lending state that they only provided the Finance and are not responsible for the mis-selling where do I stand with this?Any advice greatly appreciated.

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,710 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The lender is only liable if it was the lender that sold the PPI. If you used a broker then the broker is liable.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Many thanks for that the broker 21st Direct based in East Anglia is in liquidation how do I claim against them?I think I may have drawn a blank.
  • -taff
    -taff Posts: 15,364 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I think your complaint is over, because the FSCS has no jurisdiction because it was sold prior to 2005, and the firm no longer exists.
    Non me fac calcitrare tuum culi
  • Ok I just opened an email from the FOS they have stated that although the time limit applies they are willing to look into the complaint because the two businesses,GE Home Lending and Cigna International(Policy Provider)belonged to regulatory authorities,they are willing to conduct the case on My behalf.I am actually quite surprized as I was fully prepared to accept that the FOS had no grounds to complain but they have sent me forms to fill in.Still in shock I know its no means a guarantee of anything but they feel it is.
  • It is possible that FOS may look at the complaint. However FOS would need to be satisfied that the broker acted as agent for either the lender or insurer.

    The FCA register shows that from 14 January 2005 (when the regulation of general insurance began, the broker was directly authorised. This suggests that the broker was probably truly independent otherwise it would have tied to somebody else on that date.

    That in turn does not bode well for a favourable outcome, I'm afraid.

    This is not to say that the sale was not dubious, simply that I think it unlikely that you will find redress.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.