We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
No refund without your name and address
Comments
-
In my experience, head office does not communicate directly with store assistants. Its passed down the chain of command.
IMO its entirely possible that the assistant was "wrongly informed" by the store manager.You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0 -
iammumtoone wrote: »I don't work in retail but my understanding would be it , its the store manage that informs his/her staff of procedures in the first place. Are we to assume in this instance the store manager has deliberately trained the staff incorrectly in order to get more addresses out of customers. What would be the point of that? Would their be a target to meet on the number of addresses obtained for returns purposes?
Doh didnt see page 2 until i replied
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards