We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Exchanging item in store - advice please on legal position
Comments
-
Thanks for your reply. I wasn't asking about handling stolen goods. I am doing some legal research and would like to know if anyone regards these actions as fraudulent as I cannot see they are as the shop has not made a loss. I was hoping for some feedback from others on this. Thanks again
Stop editing your opening post. It is extremely annoying as it makes it nearly impossible for anyone to make sense of the replies.0 -
Thanks for your reply. I wasn't asking about handling stolen goods. I am doing some legal research and would like to know if anyone regards these actions as fraudulent as I cannot see they are as the shop has not made a loss. I was hoping for some feedback from others on this. Thanks again
"Legal research" to what end?
Go to a law library and research the actual law rather than just get random answers from a bunch of strangers on the internet.0 -
Thanks for your reply. I wasn't asking about handling stolen goods. I am doing some legal research and would like to know if anyone regards these actions as fraudulent as I cannot see they are as the shop has not made a loss. I was hoping for some feedback from others on this. Thanks again
Wondering on what basis you are assuming that. On the basis that you would be exchanging it for an item of similar value?
But you're missing one important fact - they have no liability to you. So yes, you would be causing them a loss as well as benefiting from a gain yourself.
Fraud is when you act dishonestly with the intention of making a personal gain (for you or someone else) or to cause someone else a loss (or expose them to the risk of a loss). So yes, this would constitute fraud imo.You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0 -
Thanks for your reply. I wasn't asking about handling stolen goods. I am doing some legal research and would like to know if anyone regards these actions as fraudulent as I cannot see they are as the shop has not made a loss. I was hoping for some feedback from others on this. Thanks again
You have no contract with the original seller and have no rights with them (unless their T&C's allow it, ie gift receipt) and it ends there, period.0 -
Thanks for your reply. I wasn't asking about handling stolen goods. I am doing some legal research and would like to know if anyone regards these actions as fraudulent as I cannot see they are as the shop has not made a loss. I was hoping for some feedback from others on this. Thanks again
You appear to be doing two things.
For one, you are claiming to be doing 'legal research' which one assumes to mean you are wanting to know the legal position. As you have been advised, the contract has been formed between the vendor and the 'original' purchaser.
However, you also seem to be asking for opinions as to whether people regard it as fraudulent.Don't put it DOWN; put it AWAY"I would like more sisters, that the taking out of one, might not leave such stillness" Emily Dickinson
Janice 1964-2016
Thank you Honey Bear0 -
I am doing some legal research and would like to know if anyone regards these actions as fraudulent as I cannot see they are as the shop has not made a loss. I was hoping for some feedback from others on this. Thanks again
Person 1 steals item then sells it/gives it to person 2.
Person 2 then takes it to shop to exchange it for something else.
This is what the likely scenario is here...
You have no rights to return an item bought in store unless it is faulty, but would need proof of purchase.
(Schools go back tomorrow...)Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0 -
Person 1 steals item then sells it/gives it to person 2.
Person 2 then takes it to shop to exchange it for something else.
This is what the likely scenario is here...
You have no rights to return an item bought in store unless it is faulty, but would need proof of purchase.
(Schools go back tomorrow...)
Amen to that! Birthday 2 weeks ago so I'm going for the Great Toy Purge. Still recovering from the hunt for the new school shoes - an hour of my life lost. In a toy box - obvious really :T0 -
Thanks for your reply. I wasn't asking about handling stolen goods. I am doing some legal research and would like to know if anyone regards these actions as fraudulent as I cannot see they are as the shop has not made a loss. I was hoping for some feedback from others on this. Thanks again
If you want to do legal research, ask a lawyer.
Asking a bunch of people on an internet forum will just give you lots of opinions.If it sticks, force it.
If it breaks, well it wasn't working right anyway.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

