We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

UKCPS Ltd Driver passenger observed leaving

Hi can anybody shed some light onto this, just got a ticket from a UKCPS for Driver passenger observed leaving, is that legal or should I just pay it? seems like a con to me.

Comments

  • ManxRed
    ManxRed Posts: 3,530 Forumite
    Don't pay it.

    Its an invoice for breaching the terms and conditions of a supposed contract formed by the 'clearly visible' signs.

    For breaching a contract you would be expected to reimburse the breached party for any losses incurred.

    For starters, under contract law, there is a duty of care on each of the contracting parties to minimise those losses. And yet, the passenger/driver (don't they know which??? there's another problem there) was 'observed' leaving site without the person doing the observing warning them that they would supposedly incur a loss should this happen. So that's a failure on their part to mitigate losses, and you can quote VCS v Ibbotson to support it.

    Secondly, have they lost any money as a result of this incident? No. They haven't.

    They might claim that this doesn't need to be a genuine loss in light of a recent court case Parking Eye v Beavis, but in that case the charge levied was deemed to be a penalty necessary to deter a breach, which means it must not be extravagant and unconscionable. The test for this might be 'what do the local council charge for a similar 'offence''? Usually (outside London) it's about £50 (or £25 if paid early) so why are UKCPS trying to charge £100? This charge is indeed 'extravagant and unconscionable' so you could challenge them on that too.

    Don't pay it though.
    Je Suis Cecil.
  • Castle
    Castle Posts: 4,947 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Councils never issue tickets for "Driver/Passenger" leaving site so there is no "similar offence"!
  • The_Deep
    The_Deep Posts: 16,830 Forumite
    Also, they have a problem with v.a.t., are they trying to dodge it?


    As this is UKCPS it will probably be a contractual charge on which v.a.t. is payable. Have they accounted for vat on their paper work? If not it becomes a breach of contract and GPEOL applies More reading here

    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5087925=



    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5033796=


    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5195437

    If you suspect tax evasion go here

    https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-revenue-customs/contact/reporting-tax-evasion
    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
  • peter_the_piper
    peter_the_piper Posts: 30,269 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 27 August 2015 at 1:30PM
    Do the signs actually ban passengers from leaving the site? How do they know they are passengers? Do they have a license to spy on people in this way? Just my thoughts . I can see them having cameras to watch cars in and out but people on site?
    https://www.gov.uk/public-space-surveillance-cctv-licence
    I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.
  • ManxRed
    ManxRed Posts: 3,530 Forumite
    Castle wrote: »
    Councils never issue tickets for "Driver/Passenger" leaving site so there is no "similar offence"!

    Ha ha, yes. So it's zero then.
    Je Suis Cecil.
  • nigelbb
    nigelbb Posts: 3,819 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Even assuming that the driver really did enter into a contract for parking in a free car park no passenger did so whether they leave the site or not is irrelevant.
  • surfboy1
    surfboy1 Posts: 345 Forumite
    tell them the passenger left the site so they need to contact them!! They do not have a clue who the passenger is !
  • peter_the_piper
    peter_the_piper Posts: 30,269 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Assuming they use the same sign as the one I looked at it says "Important, you are not to leave site" or close. Nothing about passengers.
    I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.