We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Popla decision reversed

124»

Comments

  • The_Deep
    The_Deep Posts: 16,830 Forumite
    If this continues, we will have to advise everyone that WH are a busted flush and withdraw their appeal, on the basis that WH, acting as PoPLA have lost credibility.
    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
  • Grandad123
    Grandad123 Posts: 162 Forumite
    Been there done that TD.


    There has been a lot of confusion here by the OP as he has been emailing POPLA, as he didn't realise he was dealing with WHOPLA.
  • IanP2015
    IanP2015 Posts: 21 Forumite
    Yes this was a tesco car park.

    Hopefully I've removed all my personal details:

    https://i.imgsafe.org/dca60ad708.png

    https://i.imgsafe.org/dca5f634be.png
  • IanP2015
    IanP2015 Posts: 21 Forumite
    Grandad123 wrote: »
    Been there done that TD.


    There has been a lot of confusion here by the OP as he has been emailing POPLA, as he didn't realise he was dealing with WHOPLA.


    Originally I was dealing with POPLA, where I "won" my appeal.

    But the once they re-opened it I submitted more evidence and sighted the Bevis case and then it was put on hold before moving to WHOPLA.
  • Castle
    Castle Posts: 4,947 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    IanP2015 wrote: »
    Yes this was a tesco car park.

    Hopefully I've removed all my personal details:

    https://i.imgsafe.org/dca60ad708.png

    https://i.imgsafe.org/dca5f634be.png
    Well the NTK, ("charge notice"), fails to identify the creditor, there's no date of posting and the wording to make the RK liable after 28 days is missing; so WHOPLA are wrong.
  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 43,632 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Thanks for posting up the NtK. I'll go through when I have more time over the next day or so (sorry, mad busy at the mo). Castle has identified two WHOPLA fails, add to that (from my quick glance-over) no duration of parking - 'from to'.

    I guessed right with Tesco. Time to bang the manager hard with a full-blooded complaint and get him to cancel this. Escalate to HO if necessary.
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.
Update Your Picture