We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
wireless firewall wanted
theGrinch
Posts: 3,133 Forumite
in Techie Stuff
Hello,
I have been advised to get a physical firewall (Switch/Firewall/Routers). Recommended makes, Linksys, Netgear, Belkin, DLink, Buffalo.
Minimum:
802.11b/g wireless
4 port switch
Can anyone recommend something around £30 and where I can find it online?
I have been advised to get a physical firewall (Switch/Firewall/Routers). Recommended makes, Linksys, Netgear, Belkin, DLink, Buffalo.
Minimum:
802.11b/g wireless
4 port switch
Can anyone recommend something around £30 and where I can find it online?
"enough is a feast"...old Buddist proverb
0
Comments
-
not sure why, i've turned mine off and rely on the software one'sEx forum ambassador
Long term forum member0 -
Have to agree, there's no reason to go and specifically get a hardware firewall. Even with one I'd advise every computer on the network still have it's own software firewall installed.
EDIT: Ignore this post I thought OP was talking about a pure firewall not a router with a firewall."She is quite the oddball. Did you notice how she didn't even get excited when she saw this original ZX-81?"
Moss0 -
I'm at bit surprised at the the last 2 posters?
A NAT router is an excellent level of extra protection for any home user (software firewalls can be stopped by malware for a start). The NAT bit is doing the protection, rather than the router firewall.
Do you have a BT line (ADSL router), or Cable phone (Cable/DSL router)? For BT, netgear dg834G, for cable WGR614v7.
make sure you encrypt it, whatever you get.Ever get the feeling you are wasting your time? :rolleyes:0 -
albertross wrote: »I'm at bit surprised at the the last 2 posters?
A NAT router is an excellent level of extra protection for any home user (software firewalls can be stopped by malware for a start). The NAT bit is doing the protection, rather than the router firewall.
Do you have a BT line (ADSL router), or Cable phone (Cable/DSL router)? For BT, netgear dg834G, for cable WGR614v7.
make sure you encrypt it, whatever you get.
I'm not saying there's no use to a hardware firewall, but I wouldn't go and specifically get one and I wouldn't rely on it for all the pcs in a network (as they all have their own port requirements etc, and not much use for monitoring outgoing data). It's certainly worth getting one as part of a modem/router but I think excessive to buy a standalone one unless for a larger infrastructure. Although I may have misread the OP because they asked for a firewall and as per your suggestions it would seem like they're actually after a router that happens to have a firewall."She is quite the oddball. Did you notice how she didn't even get excited when she saw this original ZX-81?"
Moss0 -
albertross wrote: »Best thing I ever bought, apart from possibly a pvr.
Off topic but bought my mum a pvr and now I'm envious
, definitely need to get one at some point. "She is quite the oddball. Did you notice how she didn't even get excited when she saw this original ZX-81?"
Moss0 -
superscaper wrote: »Have to agree, there's no reason to go and specifically get a hardware firewall.
Here's a reason. AS HAS HAPPENED QUITE A FEW TIMES IN THE PAST, especially on Norton/McAfee firewalls, some malware TURNS THEM OFF. Also said malware also turns off the security centre notifications so you don 't know it's been turned off.
Relying on a software firewall is mad.0 -
not sure why, i've turned mine off and rely on the software one's
And there posts someone who has absolutely no clue about security.
There are a whole host of them but here's one...
CWS.EZSearch.This CWS variant removes and updates previous installations of CoolWebSearch such as CWS.BootConf and CWS.SVCHost32. It also disables firewall and antivirus software notifications of the Windows Security Center (found in WinXP SP2 and Win2003 SP1). It drops a copy of itself in the Windows system folder (usually as scrsvc.exe) and creates an autorun entry for this. If Windows Firewall is installed in the system, the hijack will also register itself in the Firewall policy as among the authorized applications that can access the network.0 -
To be fair to Browntoa, he did write; not sure why...0
-
but he meant, not sure why the OP has been advised to get one.Ever get the feeling you are wasting your time? :rolleyes:0
-
Relying on a software firewall is mad.
Never said I did
Just that you shouldn't just rely on a hardware firewall either. Any problems I've had have been despite having a hardware firewall in place and operating correctly. I've already said I misunderstood the OP's question. I wouldn't see the point in getting just a firewall (certainly not money saving). You've ignored my edit to the post altogether to disagree with something I've already withdrawn. :rolleyes:"She is quite the oddball. Did you notice how she didn't even get excited when she saw this original ZX-81?"
Moss0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.5K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
